Literature DB >> 28049710

Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Synthetic Populations Depending on the Number of Parents, Relatedness, and Ancestral Linkage Disequilibrium.

Pascal Schopp1, Dominik Müller1, Frank Technow1, Albrecht E Melchinger2.   

Abstract

Synthetics play an important role in quantitative genetic research and plant breeding, but few studies have investigated the application of genomic prediction (GP) to these populations. Synthetics are generated by intermating a small number of parents ([Formula: see text] and thereby possess unique genetic properties, which make them especially suited for systematic investigations of factors contributing to the accuracy of GP. We generated synthetics in silico from [Formula: see text]2 to 32 maize (Zea mays L.) lines taken from an ancestral population with either short- or long-range linkage disequilibrium (LD). In eight scenarios differing in relatedness of the training and prediction sets and in the types of data used to calculate the relationship matrix (QTL, SNPs, tag markers, and pedigree), we investigated the prediction accuracy (PA) of Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and analyzed contributions from pedigree relationships captured by SNP markers, as well as from cosegregation and ancestral LD between QTL and SNPs. The effects of training set size [Formula: see text] and marker density were also studied. Sampling few parents ([Formula: see text]) generates substantial sample LD that carries over into synthetics through cosegregation of alleles at linked loci. For fixed [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] influences PA most strongly. If the training and prediction set are related, using [Formula: see text] parents yields high PA regardless of ancestral LD because SNPs capture pedigree relationships and Mendelian sampling through cosegregation. As [Formula: see text] increases, ancestral LD contributes more information, while other factors contribute less due to lower frequencies of closely related individuals. For unrelated prediction sets, only ancestral LD contributes information and accuracies were poor and highly variable for [Formula: see text] due to large sample LD. For large [Formula: see text], achieving moderate accuracy requires large [Formula: see text], long-range ancestral LD, and high marker density. Our approach for analyzing PA in synthetics provides new insights into the prospects of GP for many types of source populations encountered in plant breeding.
Copyright © 2017 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GBLUP; GenPred; Shared data resource; genetic relationships; genomic prediction; genomic selection; linkage disequilibrium; synthetic populations

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28049710      PMCID: PMC5223520          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.193243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  48 in total

Review 1.  Structure of linkage disequilibrium in plants.

Authors:  Sherry A Flint-Garcia; Jeffry M Thornsberry; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 26.379

2.  Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P M Visscher; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  QMSim: a large-scale genome simulator for livestock.

Authors:  Mehdi Sargolzaei; Flavio S Schenkel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome.

Authors:  Martin W Ganal; Gregor Durstewitz; Andreas Polley; Aurélie Bérard; Edward S Buckler; Alain Charcosset; Joseph D Clarke; Eva-Maria Graner; Mark Hansen; Johann Joets; Marie-Christine Le Paslier; Michael D McMullen; Pierre Montalent; Mark Rose; Chris-Carolin Schön; Qi Sun; Hildrun Walter; Olivier C Martin; Matthieu Falque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effectiveness of genomic prediction of maize hybrid performance in different breeding populations and environments.

Authors:  Vanessa S Windhausen; Gary N Atlin; John M Hickey; Jose Crossa; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark E Sorrells; Babu Raman; Jill E Cairns; Amsal Tarekegne; Kassa Semagn; Yoseph Beyene; Pichet Grudloyma; Frank Technow; Christian Riedelsheimer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Genomic prediction of northern corn leaf blight resistance in maize with combined or separated training sets for heterotic groups.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Anna Bürger; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations in rice: progress and potential for genetics research and breeding.

Authors:  Nonoy Bandillo; Chitra Raghavan; Pauline Andrea Muyco; Ma Anna Lynn Sevilla; Irish T Lobina; Christine Jade Dilla-Ermita; Chih-Wei Tung; Susan McCouch; Michael Thomson; Ramil Mauleon; Rakesh Kumar Singh; Glenn Gregorio; Edilberto Redoña; Hei Leung
Journal:  Rice (N Y)       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 4.783

View more
  21 in total

1.  Orthogonal Estimates of Variances for Additive, Dominance, and Epistatic Effects in Populations.

Authors:  Zulma G Vitezica; Andrés Legarra; Miguel A Toro; Luis Varona
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Beyond Genomic Prediction: Combining Different Types of omics Data Can Improve Prediction of Hybrid Performance in Maize.

Authors:  Tobias A Schrag; Matthias Westhues; Wolfgang Schipprack; Felix Seifert; Alexander Thiemann; Stefan Scholten; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits in an Allogamous Annual Crop: The Case of Maize Single-Cross Hybrids.

Authors:  Isadora Cristina Martins Oliveira; Arthur Bernardeli; José Henrique Soler Guilhen; Maria Marta Pastina
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Genomic prediction with multiple biparental families.

Authors:  Pedro C Brauner; Dominik Müller; Willem S Molenaar; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Novel strategies for genomic prediction of untested single-cross maize hybrids using unbalanced historical data.

Authors:  K O G Dias; H P Piepho; L J M Guimarães; P E O Guimarães; S N Parentoni; M O Pinto; R W Noda; J V Magalhães; C T Guimarães; A A F Garcia; M M Pastina
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 6.  Reciprocal recurrent genomic selection: an attractive tool to leverage hybrid wheat breeding.

Authors:  Maximilian Rembe; Yusheng Zhao; Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Omics-based hybrid prediction in maize.

Authors:  Matthias Westhues; Tobias A Schrag; Claas Heuer; Georg Thaller; H Friedrich Utz; Wolfgang Schipprack; Alexander Thiemann; Felix Seifert; Anita Ehret; Armin Schlereth; Mark Stitt; Zoran Nikoloski; Lothar Willmitzer; Chris C Schön; Stefan Scholten; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Parent-progeny imputation from pooled samples for cost-efficient genotyping in plant breeding.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Justin Gerke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genomic Prediction Within and Across Biparental Families: Means and Variances of Prediction Accuracy and Usefulness of Deterministic Equations.

Authors:  Pascal Schopp; Dominik Müller; Yvonne C J Wientjes; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  An analytical framework to derive the expected precision of genomic selection.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Elsen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.