Literature DB >> 26231985

Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection.

Pascal Schopp1, Christian Riedelsheimer1, H Friedrich Utz1, Chris-Carolin Schön2, Albrecht E Melchinger3.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Deterministic formulas accurately forecast the decline in predictive ability of genomic prediction with changing testers, target environments or traits and truncation selection. Genomic prediction of testcross performance (TP) was found to be a promising selection tool in hybrid breeding as long as the same tester and environments are used in the training and prediction set. In practice, however, selection targets often change in terms of testers, target environments or traits leading to a reduced predictive ability. Hence, it would be desirable to estimate for given training data the expected decline in the predictive ability of genomic prediction under such settings by deterministic formulas that require only quantitative genetic parameters available from the breeding program. Here, we derived formulas for forecasting the predictive ability under different selection targets in the training and prediction set and applied these to predict the TP of lines based on line per se or testcross evaluations. On the basis of two experiments with maize, we validated our approach in four scenarios characterized by different selection targets. Forecasted and empirically observed predictive abilities obtained by cross-validation generally agreed well, with deviations between -0.06 and 0.01 only. Applying the prediction model to a different tester and/or year reduced the predictive ability by not more than 18%. Accounting additionally for truncation selection in our formulas indicated a substantial reduction in predictive ability in the prediction set, amounting, e.g., to 53% for a selected fraction α = 10%. In conclusion, our deterministic formulas enable forecasting the predictive abilities of new selection targets with sufficient precision and could be used to calculate parameters required for optimizing the allocation of resources in multi-stage genomic selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26231985     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-015-2577-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  33 in total

1.  Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory.

Authors:  J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and large bias in estimates of QTL effects.

Authors:  A E Melchinger; H F Utz; C C Schön
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Breeding maize as biogas substrate in Central Europe: I. Quantitative-genetic parameters for testcross performance.

Authors:  Christoph Grieder; Baldev S Dhillon; Wolfgang Schipprack; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Genomic predictability of interconnected biparental maize populations.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Jeffrey B Endelman; Michael Stange; Mark E Sorrells; Jean-Luc Jannink; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Partitioning additive genetic variance into genomic and remaining polygenic components for complex traits in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Just Jensen; Guosheng Su; Per Madsen
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome.

Authors:  Martin W Ganal; Gregor Durstewitz; Andreas Polley; Aurélie Bérard; Edward S Buckler; Alain Charcosset; Joseph D Clarke; Eva-Maria Graner; Mark Hansen; Johann Joets; Marie-Christine Le Paslier; Michael D McMullen; Pierre Montalent; Mark Rose; Chris-Carolin Schön; Qi Sun; Hildrun Walter; Olivier C Martin; Matthieu Falque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effectiveness of genomic prediction of maize hybrid performance in different breeding populations and environments.

Authors:  Vanessa S Windhausen; Gary N Atlin; John M Hickey; Jose Crossa; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark E Sorrells; Babu Raman; Jill E Cairns; Amsal Tarekegne; Kassa Semagn; Yoseph Beyene; Pichet Grudloyma; Frank Technow; Christian Riedelsheimer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Genomic prediction of northern corn leaf blight resistance in maize with combined or separated training sets for heterotic groups.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Anna Bürger; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  4 in total

1.  Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Synthetic Populations Depending on the Number of Parents, Relatedness, and Ancestral Linkage Disequilibrium.

Authors:  Pascal Schopp; Dominik Müller; Frank Technow; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Across-years prediction of hybrid performance in maize using genomics.

Authors:  Tobias A Schrag; Wolfgang Schipprack; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Use of F2 Bulks in Training Sets for Genomic Prediction of Combining Ability and Hybrid Performance.

Authors:  Frank Technow
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Unraveling the potential of phenomic selection within and among diverse breeding material of maize (Zea mays L.).

Authors:  Thea Mi Weiß; Xintian Zhu; Willmar L Leiser; Dongdong Li; Wenxin Liu; Wolfgang Schipprack; Albrecht E Melchinger; Volker Hahn; Tobias Würschum
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.154

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.