Literature DB >> 22481121

Impact of selective genotyping in the training population on accuracy and bias of genomic selection.

Yusheng Zhao1, Manje Gowda, Friedrich H Longin, Tobias Würschum, Nicolas Ranc, Jochen C Reif.   

Abstract

Estimating marker effects based on routinely generated phenotypic data of breeding programs is a cost-effective strategy to implement genomic selection. Truncation selection in breeding populations, however, could have a strong impact on the accuracy to predict genomic breeding values. The main objective of our study was to investigate the influence of phenotypic selection on the accuracy and bias of genomic selection. We used experimental data of 788 testcross progenies from an elite maize breeding program. The testcross progenies were evaluated in unreplicated field trials in ten environments and fingerprinted with 857 SNP markers. Random regression best linear unbiased prediction method was used in combination with fivefold cross-validation based on genotypic sampling. We observed a substantial loss in the accuracy to predict genomic breeding values in unidirectional selected populations. In contrast, estimating marker effects based on bidirectional selected populations led to only a marginal decrease in the prediction accuracy of genomic breeding values. We concluded that bidirectional selection is a valuable approach to efficiently implement genomic selection in applied plant breeding programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22481121     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-012-1862-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  17 in total

1.  Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory.

Authors:  J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  Mapping quantitative trait loci from a single-tail sample of the phenotype distribution including survival data.

Authors:  Mikko J Sillanpää; Fabian Hoti
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  QTL detection with bidirectional and unidirectional selective genotyping: marker-based and trait-based analyses.

Authors:  Alizera Navabi; D E Mather; J Bernier; D M Spaner; G N Atlin
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Trait-based analyses for the detection of linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in crosses between inbred lines.

Authors:  R J Lebowitz; M Soller; J S Beckmann
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps.

Authors:  E S Lander; D Botstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The accuracy of Genomic Selection in Norwegian red cattle assessed by cross-validation.

Authors:  Tu Luan; John A Woolliams; Sigbjørn Lien; Matthew Kent; Morten Svendsen; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P J Bowman; A J Chamberlain; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  Hybrid maize breeding with doubled haploids: I. One-stage versus two-stage selection for testcross performance.

Authors:  C Friedrich H Longin; H Friedrich Utz; Jochen C Reif; Wolfgang Schipprack; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 5.574

View more
  12 in total

1.  Genomic selection in a commercial winter wheat population.

Authors:  Sang He; Albert Wilhelm Schulthess; Vilson Mirdita; Yusheng Zhao; Viktor Korzun; Reiner Bothe; Erhard Ebmeyer; Jochen C Reif; Yong Jiang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 2.  Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genomic assisted selection for enhancing line breeding: merging genomic and phenotypic selection in winter wheat breeding programs with preliminary yield trials.

Authors:  Sebastian Michel; Christian Ametz; Huseyin Gungor; Batuhan Akgöl; Doru Epure; Heinrich Grausgruber; Franziska Löschenberger; Hermann Buerstmayr
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Simultaneous improvement of grain yield and protein content in durum wheat by different phenotypic indices and genomic selection.

Authors:  M Rapp; V Lein; F Lacoudre; J Lafferty; E Müller; G Vida; V Bozhanova; A Ibraliu; P Thorwarth; H P Piepho; W L Leiser; T Würschum; C F H Longin
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.

Authors:  Garrett M See; Benny E Mote; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effectiveness of genomic prediction of maize hybrid performance in different breeding populations and environments.

Authors:  Vanessa S Windhausen; Gary N Atlin; John M Hickey; Jose Crossa; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark E Sorrells; Babu Raman; Jill E Cairns; Amsal Tarekegne; Kassa Semagn; Yoseph Beyene; Pichet Grudloyma; Frank Technow; Christian Riedelsheimer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  The genetic architecture of maize stalk strength.

Authors:  Jason A Peiffer; Sherry A Flint-Garcia; Natalia De Leon; Michael D McMullen; Shawn M Kaeppler; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Genomic selection in sugar beet breeding populations.

Authors:  Tobias Würschum; Jochen C Reif; Thomas Kraft; Geert Janssen; Yusheng Zhao
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  The accuracy of prediction of genomic selection in elite hybrid rye populations surpasses the accuracy of marker-assisted selection and is equally augmented by multiple field evaluation locations and test years.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Michael Florian Mette; Thomas Miedaner; Marlen Gottwald; Peer Wilde; Jochen C Reif; Yusheng Zhao
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Potential of marker selection to increase prediction accuracy of genomic selection in soybean (Glycine max L.).

Authors:  Yansong Ma; Jochen C Reif; Yong Jiang; Zixiang Wen; Dechun Wang; Zhangxiong Liu; Yong Guo; Shuhong Wei; Shuming Wang; Chunming Yang; Huicai Wang; Chunyan Yang; Weiguo Lu; Ran Xu; Rong Zhou; Ruizhen Wang; Zudong Sun; Huaizhu Chen; Wanhai Zhang; Jian Wu; Guohua Hu; Chunyan Liu; Xiaoyan Luan; Yashu Fu; Tai Guo; Tianfu Han; Mengchen Zhang; Bincheng Sun; Lei Zhang; Weiyuan Chen; Cunxiang Wu; Shi Sun; Baojun Yuan; Xinan Zhou; Dezhi Han; Hongrui Yan; Wenbin Li; Lijuan Qiu
Journal:  Mol Breed       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.589

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.