Literature DB >> 19220931

Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.

B J Hayes1, P M Visscher, M E Goddard.   

Abstract

Dense marker genotypes allow the construction of the realized relationship matrix between individuals, with elements the realized proportion of the genome that is identical by descent (IBD) between pairs of individuals. In this paper, we demonstrate that by replacing the average relationship matrix derived from pedigree with the realized relationship matrix in best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) of breeding values, the accuracy of the breeding values can be substantially increased, especially for individuals with no phenotype of their own. We further demonstrate that this method of predicting breeding values is exactly equivalent to the genomic selection methodology where the effects of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) contributing to variation in the trait are assumed to be normally distributed. The accuracy of breeding values predicted using the realized relationship matrix in the BLUP equations can be deterministically predicted for known family relationships, for example half sibs. The deterministic method uses the effective number of independently segregating loci controlling the phenotype that depends on the type of family relationship and the length of the genome. The accuracy of predicted breeding values depends on this number of effective loci, the family relationship and the number of phenotypic records. The deterministic prediction demonstrates that the accuracy of breeding values can approach unity if enough relatives are genotyped and phenotyped. For example, when 1000 full sibs per family were genotyped and phenotyped, and the heritability of the trait was 0.5, the reliability of predicted genomic breeding values (GEBVs) for individuals in the same full sib family without phenotypes was 0.82. These results were verified by simulation. A deterministic prediction was also derived for random mating populations, where the effective population size is the key parameter determining the effective number of independently segregating loci. If the effective population size is large, a very large number of individuals must be genotyped and phenotyped in order to accurately predict breeding values for unphenotyped individuals from the same population. If the heritability of the trait is 0.3, and N(e)=100, approximately 12474 individuals with genotypes and phenotypes are required in order to predict GEBVs of un-phenotyped individuals in the same population with an accuracy of 0.7 [corrected].

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19220931     DOI: 10.1017/S0016672308009981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  220 in total

1.  Improved linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Jennifer Listgarten; Christoph Lippert; Carl M Kadie; Robert I Davidson; Eleazar Eskin; David Heckerman
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Beatriz Villanueva; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Overview of techniques to account for confounding due to population stratification and cryptic relatedness in genomic data association analyses.

Authors:  M J Sillanpää
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis.

Authors:  Jian Yang; S Hong Lee; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies.

Authors:  Joseph E Powell; Peter M Visscher; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Integrating Nonadditive Genomic Relationship Matrices into the Study of Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits.

Authors:  Alireza Nazarian; Salvador A Gezan
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2015-12-27       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Model-free Estimation of Recent Genetic Relatedness.

Authors:  Matthew P Conomos; Alexander P Reiner; Bruce S Weir; Timothy A Thornton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  An Equation to Predict the Accuracy of Genomic Values by Combining Data from Multiple Traits, Populations, or Environments.

Authors:  Yvonne C J Wientjes; Piter Bijma; Roel F Veerkamp; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Epistasis and covariance: how gene interaction translates into genomic relationship.

Authors:  Johannes W R Martini; Valentin Wimmer; Malena Erbe; Henner Simianer
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Genomic predictability of interconnected biparental maize populations.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Jeffrey B Endelman; Michael Stange; Mark E Sorrells; Jean-Luc Jannink; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.