Literature DB >> 19704013

The accuracy of Genomic Selection in Norwegian red cattle assessed by cross-validation.

Tu Luan1, John A Woolliams, Sigbjørn Lien, Matthew Kent, Morten Svendsen, Theo H E Meuwissen.   

Abstract

Genomic Selection (GS) is a newly developed tool for the estimation of breeding values for quantitative traits through the use of dense markers covering the whole genome. For a successful application of GS, accuracy of the prediction of genomewide breeding value (GW-EBV) is a key issue to consider. Here we investigated the accuracy and possible bias of GW-EBV prediction, using real bovine SNP genotyping (18,991 SNPs) and phenotypic data of 500 Norwegian Red bulls. The study was performed on milk yield, fat yield, protein yield, first lactation mastitis traits, and calving ease. Three methods, best linear unbiased prediction (G-BLUP), Bayesian statistics (BayesB), and a mixture model approach (MIXTURE), were used to estimate marker effects, and their accuracy and bias were estimated by using cross-validation. The accuracies of the GW-EBV prediction were found to vary widely between 0.12 and 0.62. G-BLUP gave overall the highest accuracy. We observed a strong relationship between the accuracy of the prediction and the heritability of the trait. GW-EBV prediction for production traits with high heritability achieved higher accuracy and also lower bias than health traits with low heritability. To achieve a similar accuracy for the health traits probably more records will be needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19704013      PMCID: PMC2778964          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.107391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  22 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genotype x environment interaction for milk production of daughters of Australian dairy sires from test-day records.

Authors:  B J Hayes; M Carrick; P Bowman; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 3.  Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes.

Authors:  Michael E Goddard; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.

Authors:  P M VanRaden; C P Van Tassell; G R Wiggans; T S Sonstegard; R D Schnabel; J F Taylor; F S Schenkel
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Genomic selection using different marker types and densities.

Authors:  T R Solberg; A K Sonesson; J A Woolliams; T H E Meuwissen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition.

Authors:  Bernard Grisart; Wouter Coppieters; Frédéric Farnir; Latifa Karim; Christine Ford; Paulette Berzi; Nadine Cambisano; Myriam Mni; Suzanne Reid; Patricia Simon; Richard Spelman; Michel Georges; Russell Snell
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P J Bowman; A J Chamberlain; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Genome-assisted prediction of a quantitative trait measured in parents and progeny: application to food conversion rate in chickens.

Authors:  Oscar González-Recio; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme Jm Rosa; Kent A Weigel; Andreas Kranis
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Beatriz Villanueva; John A Woolliams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  77 in total

1.  Accuracy of genomic selection in European maize elite breeding populations.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhao; Manje Gowda; Wenxin Liu; Tobias Würschum; Hans P Maurer; Friedrich H Longin; Nicolas Ranc; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Impact of selective genotyping in the training population on accuracy and bias of genomic selection.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhao; Manje Gowda; Friedrich H Longin; Tobias Würschum; Nicolas Ranc; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Selfing for the design of genomic selection experiments in biparental plant populations.

Authors:  Benjamin McClosky; Jason LaCombe; Steven D Tanksley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Association mapping in an elite maize breeding population.

Authors:  Wenxin Liu; Manje Gowda; Jana Steinhoff; Hans Peter Maurer; Tobias Würschum; Carl Friedrich Horst Longin; Frédéric Cossic; Jochen Christoph Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  A novel genomic selection method combining GBLUP and LASSO.

Authors:  Hengde Li; Jingwei Wang; Zhenmin Bao
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  The impact of clustering methods for cross-validation, choice of phenotypes, and genotyping strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictions.

Authors:  Johnna L Baller; Jeremy T Howard; Stephen D Kachman; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Incorporating the single-step strategy into a random regression model to enhance genomic prediction of longitudinal traits.

Authors:  H Kang; L Zhou; R Mrode; Q Zhang; J-F Liu
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Genomic prediction using an iterative conditional expectation algorithm for a fast BayesC-like model.

Authors:  Linsong Dong; Zhiyong Wang
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Accuracy of direct genomic values in Holstein bulls and cows using subsets of SNP markers.

Authors:  Gerhard Moser; Mehar S Khatkar; Ben J Hayes; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.