Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Literature DB >> 21502387

CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Cynthia H McCollough, Shuai Leng, Lifeng Yu, Dianna D Cody, John M Boone, Michael F McNitt-Gray.

Abstract

Entities: Species

Mesh：

Year: 2011 PMID： 21502387 PMCID： PMC3079120 DOI： 10.1148/radiol.11101800

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiology ISSN： 0033-8419 Impact factor: 11.105

× No keyword cloud information.

42 in total

1. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.

Authors: Marcus Söderberg; Mikael Gunnarsson
Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 1.990

2. The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.

Authors: Adam C Turner; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Di Zhang; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal: Med Phys Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 4.071

3. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.

Authors: Jodie A Christner; James M Kofler; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.959

4. How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk?

Authors: Cynthia H McCollough; Jodie A Christner; James M Kofler
Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.959

5. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography.

Authors: Marcel van Straten; Paul Deak; Paul C Shrimpton; Willi A Kalender
Journal: Med Phys Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 4.071

6. Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children's hospital.

Authors: Patricia L Kleinman; Keith J Strauss; David Zurakowski; Kevin S Buckley; George A Taylor
Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.959

7. The feasibility of patient size-corrected, scanner-independent organ dose estimates for abdominal CT exams.

Authors: Adam C Turner; Di Zhang; Maryam Khatonabadi; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.071

8. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer.

Authors: Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Jafi Lipson; Ralph Marcus; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Robert Gould; Amy Berrington de González; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-12-14

9. Dose spread functions in computed tomography: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors: John M Boone
Journal: Med Phys Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.071

10. Monte Carlo simulations to assess the effects of tube current modulation on breast dose for multidetector CT.

Authors: Erin Angel; Nazanin Yaghmai; Cecilia Matilda Jude; John J Demarco; Christopher H Cagnon; Jonathan G Goldin; Andrew N Primak; Donna M Stevens; Dianna D Cody; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-01-06 Impact factor: 3.609

101 in total

1. Exposing exposure: automated anatomy-specific CT radiation exposure extraction for quality assurance and radiation monitoring.

Authors: Aaron Sodickson; Graham I Warden; Cameron E Farkas; Ichiro Ikuta; Luciano M Prevedello; Katherine P Andriole; Ramin Khorasani
Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-06-05 Impact factor: 11.105

2. CTDIvol, DLP, and effective dose are excellent measures for use in CT quality improvement.

Authors: Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 11.105

3. DNA double-strand breaks as potential indicators for the biological effects of ionising radiation exposure from cardiac CT and conventional coronary angiography: a randomised, controlled study.

Authors: Dominik Geisel; Elke Zimmermann; Matthias Rief; Johannes Greupner; Michael Laule; Fabian Knebel; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 5.315

4. A new technique to characterize CT scanner bow-tie filter attenuation and applications in human cadaver dosimetry simulations.

Authors: Xinhua Li; Jim Q Shi; Da Zhang; Sarabjeet Singh; Atul Padole; Alexi Otrakji; Mannudeep K Kalra; X George Xu; Bob Liu
Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 4.071

5. Practical dose point-based methods to characterize dose distribution in a stationary elliptical body phantom for a cone-beam C-arm CT system.

Authors: Jang-Hwan Choi; Dragos Constantin; Arundhuti Ganguly; Erin Girard; Richard L Morin; Robert L Dixon; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.071

10. Estimating peak skin and eye lens dose from neuroperfusion examinations: use of Monte Carlo based simulations and comparisons to CTDIvol, AAPM Report No. 111, and ImPACT dosimetry tool values.

Authors: Di Zhang; Chris H Cagnon; J Pablo Villablanca; Cynthia H McCollough; Dianna D Cody; Maria Zankl; John J Demarco; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.071