| Literature DB >> 30392077 |
Mariana Baptista1, Salvatore Di Maria2, Sandra Vieira3, Joana Santos2,4, Joana Pereira2,5, Miguel Pereira2,5, Pedro Vaz2.
Abstract
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used for pre-treatment verification and patient setup in image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). CBCT imaging is employed daily and several times per patient, resulting in potentially high cumulative imaging doses to healthy tissues that surround exposed target organs. Computed tomography dose index (CTDI) is the parameter used by CBCT equipment as indication of the radiation output to patients. This study aimed to increase the knowledge on the relation between CBCT organ doses and weighted CTDI (CTDIW) for a thorax scanning protocol. A CBCT system was modelled using the Monte Carlo (MC) radiation transport program MCNPX2.7.0. Simulation results were validated against half-value layer (HVL), axial beam profile, patient skin dose (PSD) and CTDI measurements. For organ dose calculations, a male voxel phantom ("Golem") was implemented with the CBCT scanner computational model. After a successful MC model validation with measurements, a systematic comparison was performed between organ doses (and their distribution) and CTDI dosimetry concepts [CTDIW and cumulative dose quantities f100(150) and [Formula: see text]]. The results obtained show that CBCT organ doses vary between 1.2 ± 0.1 mGy and 3.3 ± 0.2 mGy for organs located within the primary beam. It was also verified that CTDIW allows prediction of absorbed doses to tissues at distances of about 5 cm from the isocentre of the CBCT system, whereas f100(150) allows prediction of organ doses at distances of about 10 cm from the isocentre, independently from its location. This study demonstrates that these dosimetric concepts are suitable methods that easily allow a good approximation of the additional CBCT imaging doses during a typical lung cancer IGRT treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Cone-beam CT; Monte Carlo simulations; Organ doses; Voxel phantoms
Year: 2018 PMID: 30392077 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-018-0760-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiat Environ Biophys ISSN: 0301-634X Impact factor: 1.925