Literature DB >> 23864642

Experimental estimates of peak skin dose and its relationship to the CT dose index using the CTDI head phantom.

Hugo de las Heras1, Ronaldo Minniti, Sean Wilson, Chad Mitchell, Marlene Skopec, Claudia C Brunner, Kish Chakrabarti.   

Abstract

A straightforward method is presented to estimate peak skin doses (PSDs) delivered by computed tomography (CT) scanners. The measured PSD values are related to the well-known volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)), displayed on the console of CT scanners. PSD measurement estimates were obtained, in four CT units, by placing radiochromic film on the surface of a CTDI head phantom. Six different X-ray tube currents including the maximum allowed value were used to irradiate the phantom. PSD and CTDI(vol) were independently measured and later related to the CTDI(vol) value displayed on the console. A scanner-specific relationship was found between the measured PSD and the associated CTDI(vol) displayed on the console. The measured PSD values varied between 27 and 136 mGy among all scanners when the routine head scan parameters were used. The results of this work allow relating the widely used CTDI(vol) to an actual radiation dose delivered to the skin of a patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23864642      PMCID: PMC3853653          DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nct171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  27 in total

1.  AAPM protocol for 40-300 kV x-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology.

Authors:  C M Ma; C W Coffey; L A DeWerd; C Liu; R Nath; S M Seltzer; J P Seuntjens
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The calibration of experimental self-developing Gafchromic HXR film for the measurement of radiation dose in computed tomography.

Authors:  K R Gorny; S L Leitzen; M R Bruesewitz; J M Kofler; N J Hangiandreou; C H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Standardization in CT terminology: a physicist's perspective.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Dose and energy dependence of response of Gafchromic XR-QA film for kilovoltage x-ray beams.

Authors:  O Rampado; E Garelli; S Deagostini; R Ropolo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Measurement of energy dependence for XRCT radiochromic film.

Authors:  Martin J Butson; Tsang Cheung; Peter K N Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices.

Authors:  John A Bauhs; Thomas J Vrieze; Andrew N Primak; Michael R Bruesewitz; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Image Gently(SM): a national education and communication campaign in radiology using the science of social marketing.

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Kimberly E Applegate; Jennifer Boylan; Priscilla F Butler; Michael J Callahan; Brian D Coley; Shawn Farley; Donald P Frush; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Diego Jaramillo; Neil D Johnson; Sue C Kaste; Gregory Morrison; Keith J Strauss
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Estimation of the peak entrance surface air kerma for patients undergoing computed tomography-guided procedures.

Authors:  P Avilés Lucas; D R Dance; I A Castellano; E Vañó
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 9.  Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Thomas L Toth; Bernhard Schmidt; Bryan L Westerman; Hugh T Morgan; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Radiation doses in cerebral perfusion computed tomography: patient and phantom study.

Authors:  D Arandjic; F Bonutti; E Biasizzo; O Ciraj-Bjelac; M Floreani; M Giustizieri; F Iaiza; S Inkoom; G Tommasini; R Padovani
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 0.972

View more
  1 in total

1.  Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT-guided procedures.

Authors:  A Kyle Jones; Meghan E Kisiel; X John Rong; Alda L Tam
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.