Literature DB >> 21452719

The feasibility of patient size-corrected, scanner-independent organ dose estimates for abdominal CT exams.

Adam C Turner1, Di Zhang, Maryam Khatonabadi, Maria Zankl, John J DeMarco, Chris H Cagnon, Dianna D Cody, Donna M Stevens, Cynthia H McCollough, Michael F McNitt-Gray.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A recent work has demonstrated the feasibility of estimating the dose to individual organs from multidetector CT exams using patient-specific, scanner-independent CTDIvol-to-organ-dose conversion coefficients. However, the previous study only investigated organ dose to a single patient model from a full-body helical CT scan. The purpose of this work was to extend the validity of this dose estimation technique to patients of any size undergoing a common clinical exam. This was done by determining the influence of patient size on organ dose conversion coefficients generated for typical abdominal CT exams.
METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations of abdominal exams were performed using models of 64-slice MDCT scanners from each of the four major manufacturers to obtain dose to radiosensitive organs for eight patient models of varying size, age, and gender. The scanner-specific organ doses were normalized by corresponding CTDIvol values and averaged across scanners to obtain scanner-independent CTDIvol-to-organ-dose conversion coefficients for each patient model. In order to obtain a metric for patient size, the outer perimeter of each patient was measured at the central slice of the abdominal scan region. Then, the relationship between CTDIvol-to-organ-dose conversion coefficients and patient perimeter was investigated for organs that were directly irradiated by the abdominal scan. These included organs that were either completely ("fully irradiated") or partly ("partially irradiated") contained within the abdominal exam region. Finally, dose to organs that were not at all contained within the scan region ("nonirradiated") were compared to the doses delivered to fully irradiated organs.
RESULTS: CTDIvol-to-organ-dose conversion coefficients for fully irradiated abdominal organs had a strong exponential correlation with patient perimeter. Conversely, partially irradiated organs did not have a strong dependence on patient perimeter. In almost all cases, the doses delivered to nonirradiated organs were less than 5%, on average across patient models, of the mean dose of the fully irradiated organs.
CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates the feasibility of calculating patient-specific, scanner-independent CTDIvol-to-organ-dose conversion coefficients for fully irradiated organs in patients undergoing typical abdominal CT exams. A method to calculate patient-specific, scanner-specific, and exam-specific organ dose estimates that requires only knowledge of the CTDIvol for the scan protocol and the patient's perimeter is thus possible. This method will have to be extended in future studies to include organs that are partially irradiated. Finally, it was shown that, in most cases, the doses to nonirradiated organs were small compared to the dose to fully irradiated organs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21452719      PMCID: PMC3037972          DOI: 10.1118/1.3533897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  15 in total

1.  A new look at CT dose measurement: beyond CTDI.

Authors:  Robert L Dixon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach.

Authors:  John M Boone; Estella M Geraghty; J Anthony Seibert; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.

Authors:  Adam C Turner; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Di Zhang; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.

Authors:  J J DeMarco; C H Cagnon; D D Cody; D M Stevens; C H McCollough; J O'Daniel; M F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Michael R Bruesewitz; James M Kofler
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 6.  The GSF family of voxel phantoms.

Authors:  Nina Petoussi-Henss; Maria Zanki; Ute Fill; Dieter Regulla
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  E J Hall; D J Brenner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.

Authors:  J J DeMarco; C H Cagnon; D D Cody; D M Stevens; C H McCollough; M Zankl; E Angel; M F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Adult female voxel models of different stature and photon conversion coefficients for radiation protection.

Authors:  U A Fill; M Zankl; N Petoussi-Henss; M Siebert; D Regulla
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  43 in total

1.  Exposing exposure: automated anatomy-specific CT radiation exposure extraction for quality assurance and radiation monitoring.

Authors:  Aaron Sodickson; Graham I Warden; Cameron E Farkas; Ichiro Ikuta; Luciano M Prevedello; Katherine P Andriole; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  In-patient to isocenter KERMA ratios in CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden; Robert L Lavallee; Marsha L Roskopf; Ernest M Scalzetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Exposing exposure: enhancing patient safety through automated data mining of nuclear medicine reports for quality assurance and organ dose monitoring.

Authors:  Ichiro Ikuta; Aaron Sodickson; Elliot J Wasser; Graham I Warden; Victor H Gerbaudo; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Practical dose point-based methods to characterize dose distribution in a stationary elliptical body phantom for a cone-beam C-arm CT system.

Authors:  Jang-Hwan Choi; Dragos Constantin; Arundhuti Ganguly; Erin Girard; Richard L Morin; Robert L Dixon; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Pediatric chest and abdominopelvic CT: organ dose estimation based on 42 patient models.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tian; Xiang Li; W Paul Segars; Erik K Paulson; Donald P Frush; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The impact on CT dose of the variability in tube current modulation technology: a theoretical investigation.

Authors:  Xiang Li; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) provides a simple method to calculate organ dose for pediatric CT examinations.

Authors:  Bria M Moore; Samuel L Brady; Amy E Mirro; Robert A Kaufman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Patient-based estimation of organ dose for a population of 58 adult patients across 13 protocol categories.

Authors:  Pooyan Sahbaee; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  The role of chest computed tomography (CT) as a surveillance tool in children with high-risk neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Sara M Federico; Samuel L Brady; Alberto Pappo; Jianrong Wu; Shenghua Mao; Valerie J McPherson; Alison Young; Wayne L Furman; Robert Kaufman; Sue Kaste
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.