Literature DB >> 22096003

CTDIvol, DLP, and effective dose are excellent measures for use in CT quality improvement.

Rebecca Smith-Bindman, Diana L Miglioretti.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 22096003      PMCID： PMC6940005          DOI： 10.1148/radiol.11111055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN： 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  FDA public health notification: reducing radiation risk from computed tomography for pediatric and small adult patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-04-05

2.  Image gently: Ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss; Marilyn J Goske; Sue C Kaste; Dorothy Bulas; Donald P Frush; Priscilla Butler; Gregory Morrison; Michael J Callahan; Kimberly E Applegate
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

4.  Report 85: Fundamental quantities and units for ionizing radiation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J ICRU       Date:  2011-04

5.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Image gently: a web-based practice quality improvement program in CT safety for children.

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Rebecca R Phillips; Keith Mandel; Daniel McLinden; Judy M Racadio; Seth Hall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures?

Authors:  C J Martin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 3.039
  7 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Dose management in radiology: Review of the technological status].

Authors:  M Verius
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Experimental estimates of peak skin dose and its relationship to the CT dose index using the CTDI head phantom.

Authors:  Hugo de las Heras; Ronaldo Minniti; Sean Wilson; Chad Mitchell; Marlene Skopec; Claudia C Brunner; Kish Chakrabarti
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Diana L Miglioretti; Eric Johnson; Choonsik Lee; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Michael Flynn; Robert T Greenlee; Randell L Kruger; Mark C Hornbrook; Douglas Roblin; Leif I Solberg; Nicholas Vanneman; Sheila Weinmann; Andrew E Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Correlation between effective dose and radiological risk: general concepts.

Authors:  Paulo Roberto Costa; Elisabeth Mateus Yoshimura; Denise Yanikian Nersissian; Camila Souza Melo
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 May-Jun

5.  Organ doses evaluation for chest computed tomography procedures with TL dosimeters: Comparison with Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Louise Giansante; Juliana C Martins; Denise Y Nersissian; Karen C Kiers; Fernando U Kay; Marcio V Y Sawamura; Choonsik Lee; Eloisa M M S Gebrim; Paulo R Costa
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Association of Low-Dose Whole-Body Computed Tomography With Missed Injury Diagnoses and Radiation Exposure in Patients With Blunt Multiple Trauma.

Authors:  Dirk Stengel; Sven Mutze; Claas Güthoff; Moritz Weigeldt; Konrad von Kottwitz; Domenique Runge; Filip Razny; Anna Lücke; Dirk Müller; Axel Ekkernkamp; Thomas Kahl
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.