Literature DB >> 20429764

Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.

Marcus Söderberg1, Mikael Gunnarsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Today, practically all computed tomography (CT) systems are delivered with automatic exposure control (AEC) systems operating with tube current modulation in three dimensions. Each of these systems has different specifications and operates somewhat differently.
PURPOSE: To evaluate AEC systems from four different CT scanner manufacturers: General Electric (GE), Philips, Siemens, and Toshiba, considering their potential for reducing radiation exposure to the patient while maintaining adequate image quality.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The dynamics (adaptation along the longitudinal axis) of tube current modulation of each AEC system were investigated by scanning an anthropomorphic chest phantom using both 16- and 64-slice CT scanners from each manufacturer with the AEC systems activated and inactivated. The radiation dose was estimated using the parameters in the DICOM image information and image quality was evaluated based on image noise (standard deviation of CT numbers) calculated in 0.5 cm(2) circular regions of interest situated throughout the spine region of the chest phantom.
RESULTS: We found that tube current modulation dynamics were similar among the different AEC systems, especially between GE and Toshiba systems and between Philips and Siemens systems. Furthermore, the magnitude of the reduction in the exposure dose was considerable, in the range of 35-60%. However, in general the image noise increased when the AEC systems were used, especially in regions where the tube current was greatly decreased, such as the lung region. However, the variation in image noise among images obtained along the scanning direction was lower when using the AEC systems compared with fixed mAs.
CONCLUSION: The AEC systems available in modern CT scanners can contribute to a significant reduction in radiation exposure to the patient and the image noise becomes more uniform within any given scan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20429764     DOI: 10.3109/02841851003698206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  50 in total

1.  Multislice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: Technical developments, radiation dose and diagnostic value.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-26

2.  Practical dose point-based methods to characterize dose distribution in a stationary elliptical body phantom for a cone-beam C-arm CT system.

Authors:  Jang-Hwan Choi; Dragos Constantin; Arundhuti Ganguly; Erin Girard; Richard L Morin; Robert L Dixon; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Quantifying the effect of slice thickness, intravenous contrast and tube current on muscle segmentation: Implications for body composition analysis.

Authors:  Georg Fuchs; Yves R Chretien; Julia Mario; Synho Do; Matthias Eikermann; Bob Liu; Kai Yang; Florian J Fintelmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Determination of a standard deviation that could minimize radiation exposure in an automatic exposure control for pulmonary thin-section computed tomography.

Authors:  Atsushi Nambu; Eiichi Sawada; Satoshi Kato; Tsutomu Araki; Yoshihito Aikawa; Makoto Yuge; Akitoshi Saito
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-24       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Investigating the CT localizer radiograph: acquisition parameters, patient centring and their combined influence on radiation dose.

Authors:  J W Lambert; S Kumar; J S Chen; Z J Wang; R G Gould; B M Yeh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Effective dose and organ doses estimation taking tube current modulation into account with a commercial software package.

Authors:  X Lopez-Rendon; H Bosmans; R Oyen; F Zanca
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Carotid CTA at the Lowest Tube Voltage (70 kV) in Comparison with Automated Tube Voltage Adaption.

Authors:  A Eller; M Wiesmüller; W Wüst; R Heiss; M Kopp; M Saake; M Brand; M Uder; M M May
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Radiation dose and image quality in intraoperative CT (iCT) angiography of the brain with stereotactic head frames.

Authors:  Robert Forbrig; Lucas L Geyer; Robert Stahl; Jun Thorsteinsdottir; Christian Schichor; Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth; Maximilian Patzig; Moriz Herzberg; Thomas Liebig; Franziska Dorn; Christoph G Trumm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Emerging techniques for dose optimization in abdominal CT.

Authors:  Ravi K Kaza; Joel F Platt; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Mahmoud M Al-Hawary; Katherine E Maturen; Ashish P Wasnik; Amit Pandya
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.