Literature DB >> 20489103

Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children's hospital.

Patricia L Kleinman1, Keith J Strauss, David Zurakowski, Kevin S Buckley, George A Taylor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to measure patient size on CT images as a function of age at a large tertiary care children's hospital to develop current patient size data for modeling optimal x-ray exposure factors in children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anteroposterior and transverse dimensions of the head, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis were measured on CT examinations of pediatric patients less than 21 years old performed between June and November 2007. Patients with diseases that could affect measurements were excluded. From 1,009 patients, 336 examinations of each of four body regions were selected; 2,688 measurements were made and separated into 21 groups. Statistical model building and prediction equations were established for each region and 95% prediction intervals were used for analyses.
RESULTS: Rapid growth of the head occurred from birth to approximately 2 years followed by a gradual plateau until 21 years. The thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic regions showed a linear relationship between age and size. Fitted equations showed transverse trunk measurements increased more rapidly than anteroposterior measurements. The anteroposterior trunk size growth rate was relatively region independent; transverse pelvic dimensions grew more rapidly than thoracic or abdominal regions. There was a broad overlap of predicted patient size ranges as a function of age within each region. Excellent interobserver agreement was measured by Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) (all p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Fitted average patient sizes are age dependent; however, predicted individual patient size does not correlate well with age. Our study suggests that pediatric patient body size should be determined for individual patients before performing diagnostic imaging procedures that entail radiation risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20489103     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  39 in total

1.  KERMA ratios vs. SSDE: is one better at estimating pediatric CT radiation doses?

Authors:  Keith J Strauss
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-03-20

2.  The use of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in pediatric head CT: a feasibility study.

Authors:  G A Vorona; G Zuccoli; T Sutcavage; B L Clayton; R C Ceschin; A Panigrahy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  A pediatric CT dose and risk estimator.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Grace S Phillips
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-07-11

4.  Relationships of pediatric anthropometrics for CT protocol selection.

Authors:  Grace S Phillips; Arta-Luana Stanescu; Adam M Alessio
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  A comparison study of size-specific dose estimate calculation methods.

Authors:  Roshni A Parikh; Michael A Wien; Ronald D Novak; David W Jordan; Paul Klahr; Stephanie Soriano; Leslie Ciancibello; Sheila C Berlin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-09-27

7.  Partial arc beam filtration: a novel approach to reducing CT breast radiation dose.

Authors:  Kelsey B Mathieu; Dianna D Cody
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Effects of automatic tube potential selection on radiation dose index, image quality, and lesion detectability in pediatric abdominopelvic CT and CTA: a phantom study.

Authors:  Michael F Brinkley; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Ehsan Samei; Daniel J Frush; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Joshua M Wilson; Olav I Christianson; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Guidelines for anti-scatter grid use in pediatric digital radiography.

Authors:  Shannon Fritz; A Kyle Jones
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-11-27

10.  Assessment of paediatric CT dose indicators for the purpose of optimisation.

Authors:  Z Brady; F Ramanauskas; T M Cain; P N Johnston
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.