Literature DB >> 20308487

How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk?

Cynthia H McCollough1, Jodie A Christner, James M Kofler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article discusses the relatively recent adoption of effective dose in medicine that allows comparison between different imaging techniques, and describes the principles, pitfalls, and potential value of effective dose. The medical community must use this information wisely, realizing that effective dose represents a generic estimate of risk from a given procedure for a generic model of the human body.
CONCLUSION: Effective dose is not the risk for any one individual. Due to the inherent uncertainties and oversimplifications involved, effective dose should not be used for epidemiologic studies or for estimating population risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20308487     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.4179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  30 in total

1.  Exposing exposure: automated anatomy-specific CT radiation exposure extraction for quality assurance and radiation monitoring.

Authors:  Aaron Sodickson; Graham I Warden; Cameron E Farkas; Ichiro Ikuta; Luciano M Prevedello; Katherine P Andriole; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Exposing exposure: enhancing patient safety through automated data mining of nuclear medicine reports for quality assurance and organ dose monitoring.

Authors:  Ichiro Ikuta; Aaron Sodickson; Elliot J Wasser; Graham I Warden; Victor H Gerbaudo; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Communicating radiation risk to patients and referring physicians in the emergency department setting.

Authors:  Jeffrey Y Shyu; Aaron D Sodickson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Prioritizing examination-centered over patient-centered dose reduction: a hazard of institutional "benchmarking".

Authors:  Jonathan D Eisenberg; Michael E Gilmore; Mannudeep K Kalra; Chung Yin Kong; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Radiation dose levels in pediatric chest CT: experience in 499 children evaluated with dual-source single-energy CT.

Authors:  Remy-Jardin Martine; Teresa Santangelo; Lucie Colas; Faivre Jean-Baptiste; Alain Duhamel; Antoine Deschildre; Jacques Remy
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-11-09

7.  Coronary calcium scans and radiation exposure in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Bradley Messenger; Dong Li; Khurram Nasir; J Jeffrey Carr; Ron Blankstein; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Sample size requirements for estimating effective dose from computed tomography using solid-state metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimetry.

Authors:  Sigal Trattner; Bin Cheng; Radoslaw L Pieniazek; Udo Hoffmann; Pamela S Douglas; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Dose indices: everybody wants a number.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

10.  Radiation risk index for pediatric CT: a patient-derived metric.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Xiaoyu Tian; W Paul Segars; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.