Literature DB >> 21386873

Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent.

Kristien Hens1, Jean-Jacques Cassiman, Herman Nys, Kris Dierickx.   

Abstract

The use of stored tissue samples from children for genetic research raises specific ethical questions that are not all analogous to those raised when adult participants are concerned. These include issues with regard to consent, as it is typically a parent who consents to the use of samples from children. In this paper, we discuss the scope of parental consent. This scope has a temporal dimension and one related to the content of consent. It is not questioned that the temporal scope of parental consent is limited and that young adults have the right to decide on the fate of their samples when they reach the age of maturity. With regard to the content of consent, the question remains whether parents are allowed to give full broad consent to any possible future research on the samples of their children. We argue that they should not be allowed to do so, based on two premises. First, it is generally acknowledged that children have a right to express their own values and that they should be given the opportunity to develop their own autonomy as they grow older. Second, research and science are not completely value-free and some types of research may be more sensitive than other types. Children should be given the opportunity to express their values also in this respect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21386873      PMCID: PMC3137499          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  25 in total

1.  International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Bull Med Ethics       Date:  2002-10

2.  Retrospective access to data: the ENGAGE consent experience.

Authors:  Anne Marie Tassé; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Jennifer R Harris
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Proxy consent and a national DNA databank: an unethical and discriminatory combination.

Authors:  T K Baumann
Journal:  Iowa Law Rev       Date:  2001-01

4.  Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanks: differing terms and norms present serious barriers to an international framework.

Authors:  Bernice S Elger; Arthur L Caplan
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Does an appeal to the common good justify individual sacrifices for genomic research?

Authors:  Rogeer Hoedemaekers; Bert Gordijn; Martien Pijnenburg
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2006-10-17

Review 6.  Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research?

Authors:  Mats G Hansson; Joakim Dillner; Claus R Bartram; Joyce A Carlson; Gert Helgesson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  One-time general consent for research on biological samples.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-04

8.  The storage and use of biological tissue samples from minors for research: a focus group study.

Authors:  K Hens; H Nys; J-J Cassiman; K Dierickx
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Ethical issues arising from the participation of children in genetic research.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Douglas S Diekema
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Children, longitudinal studies, and informed consent.

Authors:  Gert Helgesson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2005
View more
  23 in total

1.  Regulating biobanking with children's tissue: a legal analysis and the experts' view.

Authors:  Elcke J Kranendonk; M Corrette Ploem; Raoul C M Hennekam
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Pediatric Issues in Return of Results and Incidental Findings: Weighing Autonomy and Best Interests.

Authors:  Ingrid A Holm
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-01-31

Review 3.  Reconsidering the Need for Reconsent at 18.

Authors:  Benjamin E Berkman; Dana Howard; David Wendler
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Preferences for the Return of Individual Results From Research on Pediatric Biobank Samples.

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; Sarah K Savage; Noelle L Huntington; Elissa R Weitzman; Sonja I Ziniel; Phoebe L Bacon; Cara N Cacioppo; Robert C Green; Ingrid A Holm
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.

Authors:  Amy A Lemke; Colin Halverson; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 6.  Children and biobanks: a review of the ethical and legal discussion.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; Emmanuelle Lévesque; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Development of biomarkers to optimize pediatric patient management: what makes children different?

Authors:  Jennifer Goldman; Mara L Becker; Bridgette Jones; Mark Clements; J Steven Leeder
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.851

8.  Researchers' Perspectives on Informed Consent and Ethical Review of Biobank Research in South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Erisa Mwaka; Lyn Horn
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Biobanking in the Pediatric Critical Care Setting: Adolescent/Young Adult Perspectives.

Authors:  Erin D Paquette; Sabrina F Derrington; Avani Shukla; Neha Sinha; Sarah Oswald; Lauren Sorce; Kelly N Michelson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Willingness of women to participate in obstetrical and pediatric research involving biobanks.

Authors:  Renate D Savich; Beth B Tigges; Lisbeth Iglesias Rios; Joanne McCloskey; Kristine Tollestrup; Robert D Annett
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.