Literature DB >> 25873015

Regulating biobanking with children's tissue: a legal analysis and the experts' view.

Elcke J Kranendonk1, M Corrette Ploem1, Raoul C M Hennekam2.   

Abstract

Many current paediatric studies concern relationships between genes and environment and discuss aetiology, treatment and prevention of Mendelian and multifactorial diseases. Many of these studies depend on collection and long-term storage of data and biological material from affected children in biobanks. Stored material is a source of personal information of the donor and his family and could be used in an undesirable context, potentially leading to discrimination and interfering with a child's right to an open future. Here, we address the normative framework regarding biobanking with residual tissue of children, protecting the privacy interests of young biobank donors (0-12 years). We analyse relevant legal documents concerning storage and use of children's material for research purposes. We explore the views of 17 Dutch experts involved in paediatric biobank research and focus on informed consent for donation of leftover tissue as well as disclosure of individual research findings resulting from biobank research. The results of this analysis show that experts have no clear consensus about the appropriate rules for storage of and research with children's material in biobanks. Development of a framework that provides a fair balance between fundamental paediatric research and privacy protection is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25873015      PMCID: PMC4795222          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  27 in total

Review 1.  Translational research in pediatrics: tissue sampling and biobanking.

Authors:  Alayne R Brisson; Doreen Matsui; Michael J Rieder; Douglas D Fraser
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  Genetic research on stored tissue samples from minors: a systematic review of the ethical literature.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; Herman Nys; Jean-Jacques Cassiman; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Research ethics. Children and population biobanks.

Authors:  David Gurwitz; Isabel Fortier; Jeantine E Lunshof; Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The storage and use of biological tissue samples from minors for research: a focus group study.

Authors:  K Hens; H Nys; J-J Cassiman; K Dierickx
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 5.  Children and biobanks: a review of the ethical and legal discussion.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; Emmanuelle Lévesque; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Regulating tissue research: do we need additional rules to protect research participants?

Authors:  Jessica Wright; Corrette Ploem; Marcin Sliwka; Sjef Gevers
Journal:  Eur J Health Law       Date:  2010-12

7.  Pediatric research and the return of individual research results.

Authors:  Denise Avard; Karine Sénécal; Parvaz Madadi; Daniel Sinnett
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Paediatric biobanks: what makes them so unique?

Authors:  Julie Samuël; Bartha M Knoppers; Denise Avard
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 1.954

9.  Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; Jean-Jacques Cassiman; Herman Nys; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository.

Authors:  Erin D Harris; Sonja I Ziniel; Jonathan G Amatruda; Catherine M Clinton; Sarah K Savage; Patrick L Taylor; Noelle L Huntington; Robert C Green; Ingrid A Holm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Dutch legal approach regarding health care decisions involving minors in the NGS days.

Authors:  Elcke J Kranendonk; Raoul C Hennekam; Martine Corrette Ploem
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Mwenza Blell; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Lorraine Cowley; Stephanie O M Dyke; Clara Gaff; Robert Green; Alison Hall; Amber L Johns; Bartha M Knoppers; Stephanie Mulrine; Christine Patch; Eva Winkler; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Researchers' Perspectives on Informed Consent and Ethical Review of Biobank Research in South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Erisa Mwaka; Lyn Horn
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 4.  Paediatric biobanking: Dutch experts reflecting on appropriate legal standards for practice.

Authors:  Elcke J Kranendonk; Raoul C Hennekam; M Corrette Ploem
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Rethinking the "open future" argument against predictive genetic testing of children.

Authors:  Jeremy R Garrett; John D Lantos; Leslie G Biesecker; Janet E Childerhose; Wendy K Chung; Ingrid A Holm; Barbara A Koenig; Jean E McEwen; Benjamin S Wilfond; Kyle Brothers
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 6.  Paediatric biobanking for health: The ethical, legal, and societal landscape.

Authors:  Sara Casati; Bridget Ellul; Michaela Th Mayrhofer; Marialuisa Lavitrano; Elodie Caboux; Zisis Kozlakidis
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.