Literature DB >> 20332813

Retrospective access to data: the ENGAGE consent experience.

Anne Marie Tassé1, Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Jennifer R Harris.   

Abstract

The rapid emergence of large-scale genetic databases raises issues at the nexus of medical law and ethics, as well as the need, at both national and international levels, for an appropriate and effective framework for their governance. This is even more so for retrospective access to data for secondary uses, wherein the original consent did not foresee such use. The first part of this paper provides a brief historical overview of the ethical and legal frameworks governing consent issues in biobanking generally, before turning to the secondary use of retrospective data in epidemiological biobanks. Such use raises particularly complex issues when (1) the original consent provided is restricted; (2) the minor research subject reaches legal age; (3) the research subject dies; or (4) samples and data were obtained during medical care. Our analysis demonstrates the inconclusive, and even contradictory, nature of guidelines and confirms the current lack of compatible regulations. The second part of this paper uses the European Network for Genetic and Genomic Epidemiology (ENGAGE Consortium) as a case study to illustrate the challenges of research using previously collected data sets in Europe. Our study of 52 ENGAGE consent forms and information documents shows that a broad range of mechanisms were developed to enable secondary use of the data that are part of the ENGAGE Consortium.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20332813      PMCID: PMC2987368          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  8 in total

1.  HUGO Ethics Committee Statement on DNA sampling: control and access.

Authors:  B M Knoppers; M Hirtle; S Lormeau; C M Laberge; M Laflamme
Journal:  Genetic Resour       Date:  1998

2.  Broadening consent--and diluting ethics?

Authors:  B Hofmann
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  Genomics and policymaking: from static models to complex systems?

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Growing up as a research subject: ethical and legal issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research.

Authors:  Nola M Ries
Journal:  Health Law J       Date:  2007

5.  Research ethics. Children and population biobanks.

Authors:  David Gurwitz; Isabel Fortier; Jeantine E Lunshof; Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Ethical issues arising from the participation of children in genetic research.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Douglas S Diekema
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 November 1996). Council of Europe Convention of Biomedicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Research on ethics in two large Human Biomonitoring projects ECNIS and NewGeneris: a bottom up approach.

Authors:  Birgit Dumez; Karel Van Damme; Ludwine Casteleyn
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 5.984

  8 in total
  15 in total

1.  Stem cell banking: between traceability and identifiability.

Authors:  Bartha M Knoppers; Rosario Isasi
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 11.117

2.  Asia-Pacific Health 2020 and Genomics without Borders: Co-Production of Knowledge by Science and Society Partnership for Global Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Vural Ozdemir; David H Muljono; Tikki Pang; Lynnette R Ferguson; Aresha Manamperi; Sofia Samper; Toshiyuki Someya; Anne Marie Tassé; Shih-Jen Tsai; Hong-Hao Zhou; Edmund J D Lee
Journal:  Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med       Date:  2011-03-01

Review 3.  Biobanking and deceased persons.

Authors:  Anne Marie Tassé
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission.

Authors:  Evette J Ludman; Stephanie M Fullerton; Leslie Spangler; Susan Brown Trinidad; Monica M Fujii; Gail P Jarvik; Eric B Larson; Wylie Burke
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?

Authors:  Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Anne Marie Tassé; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Jennifer R Harris
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.063

6.  Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; Jean-Jacques Cassiman; Herman Nys; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Participant views on consent in cancer genetics research: preparing for the precision medicine era.

Authors:  Karen L Edwards; Diane M Korngiebel; Lesley Pfeifer; Deborah Goodman; Anne Renz; Lari Wenzel; Deborah J Bowen; Celeste M Condit
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-01-22

Review 8.  Ethical aspects of human biobanks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Danijela Budimir; Ozren Polasek; Ana Marusić; Ivana Kolcić; Tatijana Zemunik; Vesna Boraska; Ana Jeroncić; Mladen Boban; Harry Campbell; Igor Rudan
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.351

9.  Data sharing in large research consortia: experiences and recommendations from ENGAGE.

Authors:  Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Julia Isaeva; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Anne Marie Tassé; Huei-yi Shen; Mark I McCarthy; Jennifer R Harris
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  What does engagement mean to participants in longitudinal cohort studies? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Cynthia A Ochieng; Joel T Minion; Andrew Turner; Mwenza Blell; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.