Literature DB >> 20389041

The storage and use of biological tissue samples from minors for research: a focus group study.

K Hens1, H Nys, J-J Cassiman, K Dierickx.   

Abstract

Genetic research on pediatric stored tissue samples raises specific ethical questions that differ from those raised when adults are the donors. To investigate opinions on this matter, we conducted 10 focus group discussions. Five focus groups were conducted with adult participants and 5 had teenage participants between 15 and 19 years old. The discussions were analyzed with NVIVO 8 (qualitative research software). We found the following recurrent categories: the requirement that research should not pose any burden on children and that it should benefit other children, the trust people had in the role of parents, the need for information and the growth towards autonomy. Both the adults and teenagers we interviewed thought that the inclusion of tissue samples from minors in research had ethical implications. A major concern was that nontherapeutic research would pose no extra burden on children, which would assume the use of nonintrusive methods of gathering samples and the use of samples that were gathered in a diagnostic context. Participants, however, also understood the necessity of such research. The overall impression was that parents would be the best persons to make decisions on behalf of a small child and that the same parents would engage their children in the decision-making when they grew older. People thought that there was a duty to recontact minors when they reached the age of competence but on a best-effort basis.
Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20389041     DOI: 10.1159/000294185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  19 in total

1.  Regulating biobanking with children's tissue: a legal analysis and the experts' view.

Authors:  Elcke J Kranendonk; M Corrette Ploem; Raoul C M Hennekam
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Disclosure of incidental findings from next-generation sequencing in pediatric genomic research.

Authors:  Ruqayyah Abdul-Karim; Benjamin E Berkman; David Wendler; Annette Rid; Javed Khan; Tom Badgett; Sara Chandros Hull
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Children and biobanks: a review of the ethical and legal discussion.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; Emmanuelle Lévesque; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; Jean-Jacques Cassiman; Herman Nys; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Holly K Tabor; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Emily E Namey; Stephanie M Fullerton; Laura M Beskow; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Biobanking in the Pediatric Critical Care Setting: Adolescent/Young Adult Perspectives.

Authors:  Erin D Paquette; Sabrina F Derrington; Avani Shukla; Neha Sinha; Sarah Oswald; Lauren Sorce; Kelly N Michelson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Inclusion of pediatric samples in an opt-out biorepository linking DNA to de-identified medical records: pediatric BioVU.

Authors:  T L McGregor; S L Van Driest; K B Brothers; E A Bowton; L J Muglia; D M Roden
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Challenges in Studying Modifiable Risk Factors for Birth Defects.

Authors:  Sarah C Tinker; Suzanne Gilboa; Jennita Reefhuis; Mary M Jenkins; Marcy Schaeffer; Cynthia A Moore
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2015-03

9.  Willingness of women to participate in obstetrical and pediatric research involving biobanks.

Authors:  Renate D Savich; Beth B Tigges; Lisbeth Iglesias Rios; Joanne McCloskey; Kristine Tollestrup; Robert D Annett
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-11-28

10.  Parental Perspectives on a Pediatric Human Non-Subjects Biobank.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2012-06-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.