Literature DB >> 31378129

Researchers' Perspectives on Informed Consent and Ethical Review of Biobank Research in South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Erisa Mwaka1,2, Lyn Horn3.   

Abstract

There is limited literature on the opinions and perspectives of researchers on the ethical issues in biobank research in South Africa. This study aimed to explore researchers' perspectives on informed consent and ethical review of biobank research in South Africa. An online survey was conducted among researchers and scientists at Stellenbosch University and the University of Kwazulu-Natal. The majority of researchers opined that broad consent is appropriate for biobank research. However, there was no consensus on the necessity for re-consent. Researchers were also in agreement that issues concerning informed consent and future use of samples require thorough discussions during the ethical review process. Overall, the attitude of researchers on informed consent and ethical review of biobank research was positive and ethically informed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethical review; informed consent; research ethics committee; researchers

Year:  2019        PMID: 31378129      PMCID: PMC6733622          DOI: 10.1177/1556264619866991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  59 in total

1.  What makes clinical research ethical?

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D Wendler; C Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research.

Authors:  Ezekiel J Emanuel; David Wendler; Jack Killen; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Research on stored biological samples: the views of Ugandans.

Authors:  David Wendler; Christine Pace; Ambrose O Talisuna; Faustine Maiso; Christine Grady; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  Expanding the ethical analysis of biobanks.

Authors:  Mark A Rothstein
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Reuse of samples: ethical issues encountered by two institutional ethics review committees in Kenya.

Authors:  Simon K Langat
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 6.  Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research?

Authors:  Mats G Hansson; Joakim Dillner; Claus R Bartram; Joyce A Carlson; Gert Helgesson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think?

Authors:  Asa Kettis-Lindblad; Lena Ring; Eva Viberth; Mats G Hansson
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 3.367

8.  Building on relationships of trust in biobank research.

Authors:  M G Hansson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks.

Authors:  A Cambon-Thomsen; E Rial-Sebbag; B M Knoppers
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 16.671

10.  Community involvement in the ethical review of genetic research: lessons from American Indian and Alaska Native populations.

Authors:  Richard R Sharp; Morris W Foster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  1 in total

1.  Stakeholder perspectives on the ethico-legal dimensions of biobanking in South Africa.

Authors:  Shenuka Singh; Keymanthri Moodley
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.652

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.