Literature DB >> 29980586

Reconsidering the Need for Reconsent at 18.

Benjamin E Berkman1,2, Dana Howard3, David Wendler3.   

Abstract

The prevalence of research with biological specimens has led to a debate over what type of consent is needed to obtain biological specimens from minors and store them for future studies. In most cases, parental permission is needed to obtain samples from minors. In addition, almost all commentators and guidelines maintain that researchers need the consent of the donors if they want to continue to store the samples and make them available for future studies after the donors reach the age of majority. In this Ethics Rounds, we argue that this near-consensus view is mistaken on the grounds that the agreement of the parents at the time of obtaining samples provides sufficient permission to store them and use them in research even after the donors turn 18 years old.
Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29980586      PMCID: PMC6317640          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-1202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  14 in total

1.  Cord blood banking for potential future transplantation: subject review. American Academy of Pediatrics. Work Group on Cord Blood Banking.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  One-time general consent for research on biological samples.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-04

3.  Biological sample collections from minors for genetic research: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; Herman Nys; Jean-Jacques Cassiman; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Research ethics. Children and population biobanks.

Authors:  David Gurwitz; Isabel Fortier; Jeantine E Lunshof; Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Practical guidance on informed consent for pediatric participants in a biorepository.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; John A Lynch; Sharon A Aufox; John J Connolly; Bruce D Gelb; Ingrid A Holm; Saskia C Sanderson; Jennifer B McCormick; Janet L Williams; Wendy A Wolf; Armand H M Antommaria; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Parental Consent for the Use of Residual Newborn Screening Bloodspots: Respecting Individual Liberty vs Ensuring Public Health.

Authors:  Michelle J Bayefsky; Katherine W Saylor; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  When Participants in Genomic Research Grow Up: Contact and Consent at the Age of Majority.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Ingrid A Holm; Janet E Childerhose; Armand H M Antommaria; Barbara A Bernhardt; Ellen Wright Clayton; Bruce D Gelb; Steven Joffe; John A Lynch; Jennifer B McCormick; Laurence B McCullough; D Williams Parsons; Agnes S Sundaresan; Wendy A Wolf; Joon-Ho Yu; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Children, longitudinal studies, and informed consent.

Authors:  Gert Helgesson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2005

Review 9.  Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention.

Authors:  Douglas S Diekema
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2004

10.  Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; Jean-Jacques Cassiman; Herman Nys; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Adolescent Assent and Reconsent for Biobanking: Recent Developments and Emerging Ethical Issues.

Authors:  T J Kasperbauer; Colin Halverson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.