Literature DB >> 22438108

Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.

Amy A Lemke1, Colin Halverson, Lainie Friedman Ross.   

Abstract

To be respectful of the public, biobank guiding principles and operations should be responsive to and inclusive of the values and beliefs of their participants. In an effort to increase knowledge and inform institutional policies, we conducted a deliberative engagement of individuals from two healthcare facilities in South Side Chicago that serve different socioeconomic communities to consider biobank policies regarding return of research results. We recruited primary caregivers of children receiving care at either a Federally Qualified Health Center or a university-based practice to attend two full-day deliberative engagement sessions, which included four educational presentations followed by focus group discussions. Surveys were administered to assess attitudes before and after the engagement, and an evaluation was conducted to assess the deliberative engagement process. All 45 participants self-identified as African-American. Focus group themes included: (1) overall interest in biobank participation, broad consent, and recontact; (2) root causes of distrust and potential biobank strategies to facilitate trust; (3) perceived positive and negative aspects of receiving research results; and (4) strong interest in receiving and managing their children's research results. Survey data indicated the same degree of interest in receiving results about themselves as about their children. Pre- and post-session findings showed mainly non-significant attitudinal changes in level of interest in biobank participation and return of research results, although there was a decrease in level of concern regarding identification from research data. Our findings reveal shared community insights important in facilitating relationships and policy discussions between biobank researchers and research participants.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22438108      PMCID: PMC3331902          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  46 in total

1.  Ethical issues in the communication of results.

Authors:  P A Schulte
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?

Authors:  Donna T Chen; Donald L Rosenstein; Palaniappan Muthappan; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Franklin G Miller; Ezekiel J Emanuel; David Wendler
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-03-28

3.  Letting the gene out of the bottle: a comment on returning individual research results to participants.

Authors:  Pilar N Ossorio
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Engaging the public on biobanks: outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation.

Authors:  K C O'Doherty; M M Burgess
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Research ethics. Children and population biobanks.

Authors:  David Gurwitz; Isabel Fortier; Jeantine E Lunshof; Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health.

Authors:  B A Israel; A J Schulz; E A Parker; A B Becker
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 21.981

7.  The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Yann Joly; Jacques Simard; Francine Durocher
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Offering to return results to research participants: attitudes and needs of principal investigators in the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Eric Kodish; Susan Shurin; Charles Weijer
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.289

9.  Community-based dialogue: engaging communities of color in the United states' genetics policy conversation.

Authors:  Vence L Bonham; Toby Citrin; Stephen M Modell; Tené Hamilton Franklin; Esther W B Bleicher; Leonard M Fleck
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.265

10.  The ethics of 'public understanding of ethics'--why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients' voices.

Authors:  Silke Schicktanz; Mark Schweda; Brian Wynne
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2012-05
View more
  53 in total

1.  Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.

Authors:  Colin Me Halverson; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-03-28

2.  Receptiveness to participation in genetic research: A pilot study comparing views of people with depression, diabetes, or no illness.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Jane Paik Kim
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Returning Results: Let's Be Honest!

Authors:  Bernice S Elger; Eva De Clercq
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-02-24

4.  A Community-Driven Intervention for Improving Biospecimen Donation in African American Communities.

Authors:  Kushal Patel; Wendelyn Inman; Jemal Gishe; Owen Johnson; Elizabeth Brown; Mohamed Kanu; Rosemary Theriot; Maureen Sanderson; Pamela Hull; Margaret Hargreaves
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-02-08

5.  National survey and community advisory board development for a bipolar disorder biobank.

Authors:  Mark A Frye; Allen Doederlein; Barbara Koenig; Susan L McElroy; Malik Nassan; Lisa R Seymour; Joanna M Biernacka; Allen S Daniels
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 6.744

6.  Return of individual results in epilepsy genomic research: A view from the field.

Authors:  Ruth Ottman; Catharine Freyer; Heather C Mefford; Annapurna Poduri; Daniel H Lowenstein
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.864

7.  Use of a Qualitative Story Deck to Create Scenarios and Uncover Factors Associated with African American Participation in Genomics Research.

Authors:  Susan R Passmore; Amelia M Jamison; Moaz Abdelwadoud; Taylor B Rogers; Morgan Wiggan; Daniel C Mullins; Stephen B Thomas
Journal:  Field methods       Date:  2020-12-30

8.  Return of results: ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Barbara J Evans; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.908

9.  Perceptions regarding genetic testing in populations at risk for nephropathy.

Authors:  Barry I Freedman; Alison J Fletcher; Vivek R Sanghani; Mitzie Spainhour; Angelina W Graham; Gregory B Russell; Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Ana S Iltis; Nancy M P King
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.754

10.  Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Julia Crouch; Seema M Jamal; Holly K Tabor; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.