Literature DB >> 21117746

Evidence for basal distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Glen K Martin1, Barden B Stagner, Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin.   

Abstract

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured with traditional DP-grams and level/phase (L/P) maps in rabbits with either normal cochlear function or unique sound-induced cochlear losses that were characterized as either low-frequency or notched configurations. To demonstrate that emission generators distributed basal to the f(2) primary-tone contribute, in general, to DPOAE levels and phases, a high-frequency interference tone (IT) was presented at 1/3 of an octave (oct) above the f(2) primary-tone, and DPOAEs were re-measured as "augmented" DP-grams (ADP-grams) and L/P maps. The vector difference between the control and augmented functions was then computed to derive residual DP-grams (RDP-grams) and L/P maps. The resulting RDP-grams and L/P maps, which described the DPOAEs removed by the IT, supported the notion that basal DPOAE components routinely contribute to the generation of standard measures of DPOAEs. Separate experiments demonstrated that these components could not be attributed to the effects of the 1/3-oct IT on f(2), or DPOAEs generated by the addition of a third interfering tone. These basal components can "fill in" the lesion estimated by the commonly employed DP-gram. Thus, ADP-grams more accurately reveal the pattern of cochlear damage and may eventually lead to an improved DP-gram procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21117746      PMCID: PMC2882660          DOI: 10.1121/1.3353121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). I. Basic findings in rabbits.

Authors:  G K Martin; B B Stagner; D Jassir; F F Telischi; B L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  High-frequency hearing influences lower-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  D J Arnold; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-02

3.  Delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering.

Authors:  Jonathan H Siegel; Amanda J Cerka; Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Andrei N Temchin; Pim van Dijk; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effect of stimulus-frequency ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Sumitrajit Dhar; Glenis R Long; Carrick L Talmadge; Arnold Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  In search of basal distortion product generators.

Authors:  Robert H Withnell; Jill Lodde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  P Kummer; T Janssen; W Arnold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; G R Long; A Tubis; S Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.

Authors:  G K Martin; D Jassir; B B Stagner; M L Whitehead; B L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  31 in total

1.  Calibration of otoacoustic emission probe microphones.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Response pattern based on the amplitude of ear canal recorded cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal hearing subjects.

Authors:  Ming Zhang
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-06-13

3.  Direction of wave propagation in the cochlea for internally excited basilar membrane.

Authors:  Yizeng Li; Karl Grosh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Time-domain demonstration of distributed distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

6.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth rates and slopes of forward-masked psychometric functions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Distortion products and backward-traveling waves in nonlinear active models of the cochlea.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Teresa Botti; Daniele Bertaccini; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Sensitive measures of tympanic -membrane perforation and healing processes in a gerbil model.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Glenna Stomackin; Xiaohui Lin; Glen K Martin; Timothy T Jung
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.