Literature DB >> 22696071

Response pattern based on the amplitude of ear canal recorded cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal hearing subjects.

Ming Zhang1.   

Abstract

Low-frequency otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are often concealed by acoustic background noise such as those from a patient's breathing and from the environment during recording in clinics. When using electrocochleaography (ECochG or ECoG), such as cochlear microphonics (CMs), acoustic background noise do not contaminate the recordings. Our objective is to study the response pattern of CM waveforms (CMWs) to explore an alternative approach in assessing cochlear functions. In response to a 14-msec tone burst across several acoustic frequencies, CMWs were recorded at the ear canal from ten normal hearing subjects. A relatively long tone burst has a relatively narrow frequency band. The CMW amplitudes among different frequencies were compared. The CMW amplitudes among different frequencies were compared. Two features were observed in the response pattern of CMWs: the amplitude of CMWs decreased with an increase of stimulus frequency of the tone bursts; and such a decrease occurred at a faster rate at lower frequencies than at higher frequencies. Five factors as potential mechanisms for these features are proposed. Clinical applications such as hearing screening are discussed. Therefore, the response pattern of CMWs suggests that they may be used as an alternative to OAEs in the assessment of cochlear functions in the clinic, especially at low frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22696071      PMCID: PMC4040853          DOI: 10.1177/1084713812448547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  46 in total

1.  Brief report: the cochlear microphonic as an indication of outer hair cell function.

Authors:  R H Withnell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Extratympanic electrocochleography: diagnostic and predictive value.

Authors:  D G Pappas; D G Pappas; L Carmichael; D P Hyatt; L M Toohey
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-01

3.  Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.

Authors:  Xiao-Ming Sun; Mark D Shaver
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Prediction of the pure-tone average from the speech reception and auditory brainstem response thresholds in a geriatric population.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Chien; Tzong-Yang Tu; An-Suey Shiao; Shu-Feng Chien; Yi-Fen Wang; Angela Chung-I Li; Mei-Jan Yang
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Clinical significance of the summating potential in Menière's disease.

Authors:  R Dauman; J M Aran; R Charlet de Sauvage; M Portmann
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1988-01

6.  The normal summating potential recorded from external ear canal.

Authors:  A C Coats
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1986-07

7.  Electrocochleography: using extratympanic or transtympanic methods?

Authors:  R Probst
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 8.  Cochlear physiology.

Authors:  P Dallos
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Auditory neuropathy with preserved cochlear microphonics and secondary loss of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  P Deltenre; A L Mansbach; C Bozet; F Christiaens; P Barthelemy; D Paulissen; T Renglet
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

10.  [Summating potential evoked by long-tone burst stimuli in Menière's disease].

Authors:  K Arakawa
Journal:  Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho       Date:  1998-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  A mouse model validates the utility of electrocochleography in verifying endolymphatic hydrops.

Authors:  Sami J Melki; Yiping Li; Maroun T Semaan; Qing Yin Zheng; Cliff A Megerian; Kumar N Alagramam
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-08

2.  Effects of Stimulus Intensity on Low-Frequency Toneburst Cochlear Microphonic Waveforms.

Authors:  Ming Zhang
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2013-02-21

3.  Use of an Extra-Tympanic Membrane Electrode to Record Cochlear Microphonics with Click, Tone Burst and Chirp Stimuli.

Authors:  Laura M Coraci; Andy J Beynon
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2021-03-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.