Literature DB >> 21361439

Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Michael P Gorga1, Stephen T Neely, Judy Kopun, Hongyang Tan.   

Abstract

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were used to describe suppression growth in normal-hearing humans. Data were collected at eight f(2) frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 8 kHz for L(2) levels ranging from 10 to 60 dB sensation level. For each f(2) and L(2) combination, suppression was measured for nine or eleven suppressor frequencies (f(3)) whose levels varied from -20 to 85 dB sound pressure level (SPL). Suppression grew nearly linearly when f(3) ≈ f(2), grew more rapidly for f(3) < f(2), and grew more slowly for f(3) > f(2). These results are consistent with physiological and mechanical data from lower animals, as well as previous DPOAE data from humans, although no previous DPOAE study has described suppression growth for as wide a range of frequencies and levels. These trends were evident for all f(2) and L(2) combinations; however, some exceptions were noted. Specifically, suppression growth rate was less steep as a function of f(3) for f(2) frequencies ≤ 1 kHz. Thus, despite the qualitative similarities across frequency, there were quantitative differences related to f(2), suggesting that there may be subtle differences in suppression for frequencies above 1 kHz compared to frequencies below 1 kHz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21361439      PMCID: PMC3070999          DOI: 10.1121/1.3523287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  42 in total

1.  The use of distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression as an estimate of response growth.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Patricia A Dorn; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Maturation of the human cochlear amplifier: distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves recorded at low and high primary tone levels.

Authors:  C Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Two-tone suppression in auditory-nerve fibers: extension of a stimulus-response relationship.

Authors:  P J Abbas; M B Sachs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Two-tone unmasking and suppression in a forward-masking situation.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  M B Sachs; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Optimal L(1)-L(2) primary tone level separation remains independent of test frequency in humans.

Authors:  P Kummer; T Janssen; P Hulin; W Arnold
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Suppressibility of the 2f1-f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man.

Authors:  A M Brown; D T Kemp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Patricia A Dorn; Brenda M Hoover; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Ipsilateral distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) suppression in children with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Tracy S Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporal aspects of suppression in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodriguez; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Influence of suppression on restoration of spectral loudness summation in listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Robin R High; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: results from cochlear mechanics simulation.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Liu; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in hearing-impaired humans.

Authors:  Alyson Gruhlke; Cori Birkholz; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt; Kendra Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Growth of suppression using distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements in hearing-impaired humans.

Authors:  Cori Birkholz; Alyson Gruhlke; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt; Kendra K Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Signal-processing strategy for restoration of cross-channel suppression in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Multi-tone suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Nicole E Sieck; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Judy G Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Reliability and clinical test performance of cochlear reflectance.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Sara E Fultz; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission two-tone suppression in humans.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Emily C Bosen; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.840

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.