Literature DB >> 10511630

Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). I. Basic findings in rabbits.

G K Martin1, B B Stagner, D Jassir, F F Telischi, B L Lonsbury-Martin.   

Abstract

The present study measured interference-response areas (IRAs) for distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) at 2f(1)-f(2), 3f(1)-2f(2), and 2f(2)-f(1). The IRAs were obtained in either awake or anesthetized rabbits, or in anesthetized guinea pigs and mice, by sweeping the frequencies and levels of an interference tone (IT) around a set of f(1) and f(2) primary tones, at several fixed frequencies and levels, while plotting the effects of the IT on DPOAE level. An unexpected outcome was the occurrence of regions of suppression and/or enhancement of DPOAE level when the IT was at a frequency slightly less than to more than an octave above f(2). The IRA of the 2f(1)-f(2) DPOAE typically displayed a high-frequency (HF) lobe of suppression, while the 2f(2)-f(1) emission often exhibited considerable amounts of enhancement. Moreover, for the 2f(2)-f(1) DPOAE, when enhancement was absent, its IRA usually tuned to a region above f(2). Whether or not suppression/enhancement was observed depended upon primary-tone level and frequency separation, as well as on the relative levels of the two primaries. Various physiological manipulations involving anesthesia, eighth-nerve section, diuretic administration, or pure-tone overstimulation showed that these phenomena were of cochlear origin, and were not dependent upon the acoustic reflex or cochlear-efferent activity. The aftereffects of applying diuretics or over-exposures revealed that suppression/enhancement required the presence of sensitive, low-level DPOAE-generator sources. Additionally, suppression/enhancement were general effects in that, in addition to rabbits, they were also observed in mice and guinea pigs. Further, corresponding plots of DPOAE phase often revealed areas of differing phase change in the vicinity of the primary tones as compared to regions above f(2). These findings, along with the effects of tonal exposures designed to fatigue regions above f(2), and instances in which DPOAE level was dependent upon the amount of suppression/enhancement, suggested that the interactions of two DPOAE-generator sources contributed, in some manner, to these phenomena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10511630     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00119-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  13 in total

1.  Variation in inter-animal susceptibility to noise damage is associated with alpha 9 acetylcholine receptor subunit expression level.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Paul K Foster
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Local cochlear damage reduces local nonlinearity and decreases generator-type cochlear emissions while increasing reflector-type emissions.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Time-domain demonstration of distributed distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Characterizing distortion-product otoacoustic emission components across four species.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; You Sun Chung; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Simultaneous Intracochlear Pressure Measurements from Two Cochlear Locations: Propagation of Distortion Products in Gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

7.  Amplification and Suppression of Traveling Waves along the Mouse Organ of Corti: Evidence for Spatial Variation in the Longitudinal Coupling of Outer Hair Cell-Generated Forces.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Brian E Applegate; John S Oghalai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Evidence for basal distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Dissociation between distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Otoacoustic emissions in humans, birds, lizards, and frogs: evidence for multiple generation mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Dennis M Freeman; James C Saunders; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.