Literature DB >> 21110607

Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors.

Daniel Fogerty1, Larry E Humes.   

Abstract

This study investigated the relative contributions of consonants and vowels to the perceptual intelligibility of monosyllabic consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) words. A noise replacement paradigm presented CVCs with only consonants or only vowels preserved. Results demonstrated no difference between overall word accuracy in these conditions; however, different error patterns were observed. A significant effect of lexical difficulty was demonstrated for both types of replacement, whereas the noise level used during replacement did not influence results. The contribution of consonant and vowel transitional information present at the consonant-vowel boundary was also explored. The proportion of speech presented, regardless of the segmental condition, overwhelmingly predicted performance. Comparisons were made with previous segment replacement results using sentences [Fogerty, and Kewley-Port (2009). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 847-857]. Results demonstrated that consonants contribute to intelligibility equally in both isolated CVC words and sentences. However, vowel contributions were mediated by context, with greater contributions to intelligibility in sentence contexts. Therefore, it appears that vowels in sentences carry unique speech cues that greatly facilitate intelligibility which are not informative and/or present during isolated word contexts. Consonants appear to provide speech cues that are equally available and informative during sentence and isolated word presentations.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21110607      PMCID: PMC3003731          DOI: 10.1121/1.3493439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations.

Authors:  J A Bashford; K R Riener; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

2.  An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech.

Authors:  Mohinish Shukla; Marina Nespor; Jacques Mehler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The "soul" of language does not use statistics: reflections on vowels and consonants.

Authors:  Jacques Mehler; Marcela Peña; Marina Nespor; Luca Bonatti
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Are vowels and consonants processed differently? Event-related potential evidence with a delayed letter paradigm.

Authors:  Manuel Carreiras; Margaret Gillon-Dowens; Marta Vergara; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Age and decision strategies in running memory for speech: effects of prosody and linguistic structure.

Authors:  A Wingfield; C J Lahar; E A Stine
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1989-07

6.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition.

Authors:  A Boothroyd; S Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-04-14

9.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels.

Authors:  W Strange; J J Jenkins; T L Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Identifying vowels in CVC syllables: effects of inserting silence and noise.

Authors:  E M Parker; R L Diehl
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-10
View more
  8 in total

1.  Clear Speech Variants: An Acoustic Study in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Jennifer Lam; Kris Tjaden
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Perceptual weighting of individual and concurrent cues for sentence intelligibility: frequency, envelope, and fine structure.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Importance of envelope modulations during consonants and vowels in segmentally interrupted sentences.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Acoustic predictors of intelligibility for segmentally interrupted speech: temporal envelope, voicing, and duration.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Diane Kewley-Port; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; William J Bologna; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The role of vowel and consonant fundamental frequency, envelope, and temporal fine structure cues to the intelligibility of words and sentences.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Speech recognition in natural background noise.

Authors:  Julien Meyer; Laure Dentel; Fanny Meunier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.