Literature DB >> 3411038

Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition.

A Boothroyd1, S Nittrouer.   

Abstract

Percent recognition of phonemes and whole syllables, measured in both consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) words and CVC nonsense syllables, is reported for normal young adults listening at four signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios. Similar data are reported for the recognition of words and whole sentences in three types of sentence: high predictability (HP) sentences, with both semantic and syntactic constraints; low predictability (LP) sentences, with primarily syntactic constraints; and zero predictability (ZP) sentences, with neither semantic nor syntactic constraints. The probability of recognition of speech units in context (pc) is shown to be related to the probability of recognition without context (pi) by the equation pc = 1 - (1-pi)k, where k is a constant. The factor k is interpreted as the amount by which the channels of statistically independent information are effectively multiplied when contextual constraints are added. Empirical values of k are approximately 1.3 and 2.7 for word and sentence context, respectively. In a second analysis, the probability of recognition of wholes (pw) is shown to be related to the probability of recognition of the constituent parts (pp) by the equation pw = pjp, where j represents the effective number of statistically independent parts within a whole. The empirically determined mean values of j for nonsense materials are not significantly different from the number of parts in a whole, as predicted by the underlying theory. In CVC words, the value of j is constant at approximately 2.5. In the four-word HP sentences, it falls from approximately 2.5 to approximately 1.6 as the inherent recognition probability for words falls from 100% to 0%, demonstrating an increasing tendency to perceive HP sentences either as wholes, or not at all, as S/N ratio deteriorates.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3411038     DOI: 10.1121/1.396976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  86 in total

1.  Modeling spoken word recognition performance by pediatric cochlear implant users using feature identification.

Authors:  S A Frisch; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Modeling open-set spoken word recognition in postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: some preliminary results with the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  Ted A Meyer; Stefan A Frisch; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  The redundancy of phonemes in sentential context.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Coherence masking protection for mid-frequency formants by adults and children.

Authors:  Eric Tarr; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effects of syntactic complexity on processing sentences in noise.

Authors:  Rebecca Carroll; Esther Ruigendijk
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-04

6.  Estimating speech spectra for copy synthesis by linear prediction and by hand.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Kathryn R Dubowski; Morgana L Davids; Emily F Thomas; Nina U Paddu; Yael S Grossman; Marina Moskalenko
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Cochlea-scaled entropy, not consonants, vowels, or time, best predicts speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.