Literature DB >> 21361454

Perceptual weighting of individual and concurrent cues for sentence intelligibility: frequency, envelope, and fine structure.

Daniel Fogerty1.   

Abstract

The speech signal may be divided into frequency bands, each containing temporal properties of the envelope and fine structure. For maximal speech understanding, listeners must allocate their perceptual resources to the most informative acoustic properties. Understanding this perceptual weighting is essential for the design of assistive listening devices that need to preserve these important speech cues. This study measured the perceptual weighting of young normal-hearing listeners for the envelope and fine structure in each of three frequency bands for sentence materials. Perceptual weights were obtained under two listening contexts: (1) when each acoustic property was presented individually and (2) when multiple acoustic properties were available concurrently. The processing method was designed to vary the availability of each acoustic property independently by adding noise at different levels. Perceptual weights were determined by correlating a listener's performance with the availability of each acoustic property on a trial-by-trial basis. Results demonstrated that weights were (1) equal when acoustic properties were presented individually and (2) biased toward envelope and mid-frequency information when multiple properties were available. Results suggest a complex interaction between the available acoustic properties and the listening context in determining how best to allocate perceptual resources when listening to speech in noise.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21361454      PMCID: PMC3070991          DOI: 10.1121/1.3531954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  47 in total

1.  Channel weights for speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  M A Mehr; C W Turner; A Parkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Coding the temporal structure of sounds in auditory cortex.

Authors:  D R Moore; J W Schnupp; A J King
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Decision strategies of hearing-impaired listeners in spectral shape discrimination.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The intelligibility of speech with "holes" in the spectrum.

Authors:  Kalyan Kasturi; Philipos C Loizou; Michael Dorman; Tony Spahr
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Finn Dubbelboer; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The importance of temporal fine structure information in speech at different spectral regions for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of lowpass and highpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine structure or envelope cues.

Authors:  Marine Ardoint; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  19 in total

1.  Level considerations for chimeric processing: Temporal envelope and fine structure contributions to speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jenine L Entwistle
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Are there sex effects for speech intelligibility in American English? Examining the influence of talker, listener, and methodology.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Dane B Whittaker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Binaural gain modulation of spectrotemporal tuning in the interaural level difference-coding pathway.

Authors:  Louisa J Steinberg; Brian J Fischer; Jose L Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Sarah E Yoho; Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Bobby E Gibbs; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A correlational method to concurrently measure envelope and temporal fine structure weights: effects of age, cochlear pathology, and spectral shaping.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech recognition interference by the temporal and spectral properties of a single competing talker.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Electrophysiologic Assessment of Auditory Training Benefits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Kimberly Jenkins
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.