Literature DB >> 26093436

Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Daniel Fogerty1, Jayne B Ahlstrom2, William J Bologna2, Judy R Dubno2.   

Abstract

This study investigated how single-talker modulated noise impacts consonant and vowel cues to sentence intelligibility. Younger normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and older hearing-impaired listeners completed speech recognition tests. All listeners received spectrally shaped speech matched to their individual audiometric thresholds to ensure sufficient audibility with the exception of a second younger listener group who received spectral shaping that matched the mean audiogram of the hearing-impaired listeners. Results demonstrated minimal declines in intelligibility for older listeners with normal hearing and more evident declines for older hearing-impaired listeners, possibly related to impaired temporal processing. A correlational analysis suggests a common underlying ability to process information during vowels that is predictive of speech-in-modulated noise abilities. Whereas, the ability to use consonant cues appears specific to the particular characteristics of the noise and interruption. Performance declines for older listeners were mostly confined to consonant conditions. Spectral shaping accounted for the primary contributions of audibility. However, comparison with the young spectral controls who received identical spectral shaping suggests that this procedure may reduce wideband temporal modulation cues due to frequency-specific amplification that affected high-frequency consonants more than low-frequency vowels. These spectral changes may impact speech intelligibility in certain modulation masking conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26093436      PMCID: PMC4474944          DOI: 10.1121/1.4921603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  67 in total

1.  The amplitude-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects.

Authors:  F A Boettcher; E A Poth; J H Mills; J R Dubno
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Consonant perception in quiet: effect of increasing the consonant-vowel ratio with compression amplification.

Authors:  L Hickson; D Byrne
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners.

Authors:  Erwin L J George; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; S Theo Goverts; Joost M Festen; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.

Authors:  R Drullman; J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of initial-consonant intensity on the speed of lexical decisions.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Allen A Montgomery; Kimberlee A Crass
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  C A Hogan; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Does memory constrain utilization of top-down information in spoken word recognition? Evidence from normal aging.

Authors:  A Wingfield; A H Alexander; S Cavigelli
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1994 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.500

View more
  8 in total

1.  Influences of noise-interruption and information-bearing acoustic changes on understanding simulated electric-acoustic speech.

Authors:  Christian Stilp; Gail Donaldson; Soohee Oh; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; William J Bologna; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; William J Bologna; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Functional Age-Related Changes Within the Human Auditory System Studied by Audiometric Examination.

Authors:  Oliver Profant; Milan Jilek; Zbynek Bures; Vaclav Vencovsky; Diana Kucharova; Veronika Svobodova; Jiri Korynta; Josef Syka
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  Effects of Age on Cortical Tracking of Word-Level Features of Continuous Competing Speech.

Authors:  Juraj Mesik; Lucia Ray; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Comparing Speech Recognition for Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing: Simulations for Controlling Differences in Speech Levels and Spectral Shape.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Rachel Madorskiy; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.297

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.