Literature DB >> 23838986

Acoustic predictors of intelligibility for segmentally interrupted speech: temporal envelope, voicing, and duration.

Daniel Fogerty1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Temporal interruption limits the perception of speech to isolated temporal glimpses. An analysis was conducted to determine the acoustic parameter that best predicts speech recognition from temporal fragments that preserve different types of speech information-namely, consonants and vowels.
METHOD: Young listeners with normal hearing previously completed word and sentence recognition tasks that required them to repeat word and sentence material that was temporally interrupted. Interruptions were designed to replace various portions of consonants or vowels with low-level noise. Acoustic analysis of preserved consonant and vowel segments was conducted to investigate the role of the preserved temporal envelope, voicing, and speech duration in predicting performance.
RESULTS: Results demonstrate that the temporal envelope, predominantly from vowels, is most important for sentence recognition and largely predicts results across consonant and vowel conditions. In contrast, for isolated words the proportion of speech preserved was the best predictor of performance regardless of whether glimpses were from consonants or vowels.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest consideration of the vowel temporal envelope in speech transmission and amplification technologies for improving the intelligibility of temporally interrupted sentences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustics; hearing; noise; prosody; speech; speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23838986      PMCID: PMC4064467          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0203)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  22 in total

1.  The effects of a flattened fundamental frequency on intelligibility at the sentence level.

Authors:  J S Laures; G Weismer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  Christopher J Darwin; Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects.

Authors:  S Rosen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Su-Hyun Jin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory grouping based on fundamental frequency and formant peak frequency.

Authors:  A S Bregman; C Liao; R Levitan
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1990-09

6.  The relative roles of vowels and consonants in discriminating talker identity versus word meaning.

Authors:  Michael J Owren; Gina C Cardillo
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Factors influencing glimpsing of speech in noise.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A new technique for quantifying temporal envelope contrasts.

Authors:  T W Fortune; B D Woodruff; D A Preves
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Gaëtan Gilbert; Héloïse Carn; Stéphane Garnier; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

1.  Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Clear Speech Variants: An Acoustic Study in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Jennifer Lam; Kris Tjaden
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Bobby E Gibbs; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Importance of envelope modulations during consonants and vowels in segmentally interrupted sentences.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; William J Bologna; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of initial-consonant intensity on the speed of lexical decisions.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Allen A Montgomery; Kimberlee A Crass
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Indexical properties influence time-varying amplitude and fundamental frequency contributions of vowels to sentence intelligibility.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2015-07-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.