Literature DB >> 22978895

The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.

Daniel Fogerty1, Diane Kewley-Port, Larry E Humes.   

Abstract

This study investigated the ability to use cues contained within vowel and consonant segments by older listeners with normal or impaired hearing. Spectral shaping restored audibility for the hearing-impaired group. Word and sentence materials were processed to contain primarily consonants or vowels by replacing segments with low-level speech-shaped noise. The proportion of the total duration of preserved speech was varied by manipulating the amount of transitional information contained within vowel and consonant segments. Older listeners performed more poorly than young listeners on all conditions except when listening to sentences with only the vowels preserved. Results confirmed a greater contribution to intelligibility of vowel segments in sentences, but not in words, for young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and older hearing-impaired listeners. Older listeners received a greater benefit than young listeners from vowels presented in a sentence context. Correlation analyses among the older listeners demonstrated an association between consonant and vowel performance in isolated words but not in sentences. In addition, the use of vowel cues in sentences was relatively independent of age and auditory sensitivity when audibility is ensured. Combined, results argue that older listeners are able to use essential cues carried by vowels for sentence intelligibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22978895      PMCID: PMC3460985          DOI: 10.1121/1.4739463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  46 in total

Review 1.  Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects.

Authors:  S Rosen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Effect of consonant-vowel ratio modification on amplitude envelope cues for consonant recognition.

Authors:  R L Freyman; G P Nerbonne; H A Cote
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-04

Review 3.  Memory, language, and ageing.

Authors:  D M Burke; D G Mackay
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Acoustic measures of temporal intervals across speaking rates: variability of syllable- and phrase-level relative timing.

Authors:  L Max; A J Caruso
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal.

Authors:  F Ramus; M Nespor; J Mehler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.

Authors:  M K Pichora-Fuller; B A Schneider; M Daneman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Phoneme perception via hearing aids with and without compression and the role of temporal resolution.

Authors:  W A Dreschler
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1989

10.  Does memory constrain utilization of top-down information in spoken word recognition? Evidence from normal aging.

Authors:  A Wingfield; A H Alexander; S Cavigelli
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1994 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.500

View more
  11 in total

1.  Effects of age and hearing loss on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Importance of envelope modulations during consonants and vowels in segmentally interrupted sentences.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustic predictors of intelligibility for segmentally interrupted speech: temporal envelope, voicing, and duration.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; William J Bologna; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; William J Bologna; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Assessment of low-frequency hearing with narrow-band chirp-evoked 40-Hz sinusoidal auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Uzma S Wilson; Wafaa A Kaf; Ali A Danesh; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Acoustic and perceptual correlates of faster-than-habitual speech produced by speakers with Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Christina Kuo; Kris Tjaden; Joan E Sussman
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.

Authors:  David L Woods; Tanya Arbogast; Zoe Doss; Masood Younus; Timothy J Herron; E William Yund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Infants exploit vowels to label objects and actions from continuous audiovisual stimuli.

Authors:  Cristina Jara; Cristóbal Moënne-Loccoz; Marcela Peña
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.