Literature DB >> 17131589

The "soul" of language does not use statistics: reflections on vowels and consonants.

Jacques Mehler1, Marcela Peña, Marina Nespor, Luca Bonatti.   

Abstract

This paper reviews studies of language processing with the aim of establishing whether any type of statistical information embedded in linguistic signals can be exploited by the language learner. The constraints as to the information that can be so used, we will argue, should be used to inform theories of language acquisition. We present two experiments with their respective controls. Both show that consonants (Cs) are much more suitable than vowels (Vs) to parse speech streams using statistical dependencies. These experiments use streams composed of items in which statistical information is carried either by the sequence of consonants or by the sequence of vowels. Both kinds of items are simultaneously present is the speech stream but, crucially, their overlap is only partial. Since the location of dips in transitional probabilities (TPs) between adjacent syllables differ for the first and the second type of sequences, we can explore whether consonants and vowels are equally efficient segments to parse signals. Our results show that "consonant words" (CW) are significantly preferred over "vowel words" (VW). We discuss the implication of our results for models of language acquisition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17131589     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70427-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  10 in total

1.  Does LGHT prime DARK? Masked associative priming with addition neighbors.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Pablo Gomez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

2.  Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Plus or minus 30 years in the language sciences.

Authors:  Elissa L Newport
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-07

4.  The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Diane Kewley-Port; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  On coding non-contiguous letter combinations.

Authors:  Frédéric Dandurand; Jonathan Grainger; Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Jean-Pierre Granier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-21

6.  The differential time course for consonant and vowel processing in Arabic: implications for language learning and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sami Boudelaa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-22

7.  Articulating What Infants Attune to in Native Speech.

Authors:  Catherine T Best; Louis M Goldstein; Hosung Nam; Michael D Tyler
Journal:  Ecol Psychol       Date:  2016-11-01

8.  The role of segmental and durational cues in the processing of reduced words.

Authors:  Marco van de Ven; Mirjam Ernestus
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  Visual Rhyme Judgment in Adults With Mild-to-Severe Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Mary Rudner; Henrik Danielsson; Björn Lyxell; Thomas Lunner; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-05-28

10.  Tracking the emergence of the consonant bias in visual-word recognition: evidence with developing readers.

Authors:  Ana Paula Soares; Manuel Perea; Montserrat Comesaña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.