Literature DB >> 18510451

Are vowels and consonants processed differently? Event-related potential evidence with a delayed letter paradigm.

Manuel Carreiras1, Margaret Gillon-Dowens, Marta Vergara, Manuel Perea.   

Abstract

To investigate the neural bases of consonant and vowel processing, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants read words and pseudowords in a lexical decision task. The stimuli were displayed in three different conditions: (i) simultaneous presentation of all letters (baseline condition); (ii) presentation of all letters, except that two internal consonants were delayed for 50 msec (consonants-delayed condition); and (iii) presentation of all letters, except that two internal vowels were delayed for 50 msec (vowels-delayed condition). The behavioral results showed that, for words, response times in the consonants-delayed condition were longer than in the vowels-delayed condition, which, in turn, were longer than in the baseline condition. The ERPs showed that, starting as early as 150 msec, words in the consonants-delayed condition produced a larger negativity than words in vowels-delayed condition. In addition, there were peak latency differences and amplitude differences in the P150, N250, P325, and N400 components between the baseline and the two letter-delayed conditions. We examine the implications of these findings for models of visual-word recognition and reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18510451     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  18 in total

1.  Does the advantage of the upper part of words occur at the lexical level?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Montserrat Comesaña; Ana P Soares
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

2.  Does LGHT prime DARK? Masked associative priming with addition neighbors.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Pablo Gomez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

3.  Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Transposition effects in reading Japanese Kana: are they orthographic in nature?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Chie Nakatani; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

5.  Newborn's brain activity signals the origin of word memories.

Authors:  Silvia Benavides-Varela; Jean-Rémy Hochmann; Francesco Macagno; Marina Nespor; Jacques Mehler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Consonantal overlap effects in a perceptual matching task.

Authors:  Stéphanie Massol; Manuel Carreiras; Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform.

Authors:  Donna Coch; Priya Mitra
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Deepening understanding of language through synaesthesia: a call to reform and expand.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mankin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Diane Kewley-Port; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  An electrophysiological investigation of early effects of masked morphological priming.

Authors:  Joanna Morris; Jonathan Grainger; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2008-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.