Literature DB >> 1561046

Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations.

J A Bashford1, K R Riener, R M Warren.   

Abstract

Outside of the laboratory, listening conditions are often less than ideal, and when attending to sounds from a particular source, portions are often obliterated by extraneous noises. However, listeners possess rather elegant reconstructive mechanisms. Restoration can be complete, so that missing segments are indistinguishable from those actually present and the listener is unaware that the signal is fragmented. This phenomenon, called temporal induction (TI), has been studied extensively with nonverbal signals and to a lesser extent with speech. Earlier studies have demonstrated that TI can produce illusory continuity spanning gaps of a few hundred milliseconds when portions of a signal are replaced by a louder sound capable of masking the signal were it actually present. The present study employed various types of speech signals with periodic gaps and measured the effects upon intelligibility produced by filling these gaps with noises. Enhancement of intelligibility through multiple phonemic restoration occurred when the acoustic requirements for TI were met and when sufficient contextual information was available in the remaining speech fragments. It appears that phonemic restoration is a specialized form of TI that uses linguistic skills for the reconstruction of obliterated speech.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1561046     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  18 in total

1.  Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-08

2.  Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing.

Authors:  T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of forward and backward masking on speech intelligibility.

Authors:  D D Dirks; D Bower
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Passing the strongly voiced components of noisy speech.

Authors:  C M Holloway
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise.

Authors:  G L Powers; J C Wilcox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Do off-frequency simultaneous maskers suppress the signal?

Authors:  D L Weber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Speech communication in very noisy environments.

Authors:  C Cherry; R Wiley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  36 in total

1.  Phonemic restoration effect reversed in a reverberant room.

Authors:  Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Enhancing intelligibility of narrowband speech with out-of-band noise: evidence for lateral suppression at high-normal intensity.

Authors:  James A Bashford; Richard M Warren; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Intelligibilities of 1-octave rectangular bands spanning the speech spectrum when heard separately and paired.

Authors:  Richard M Warren; James A Bashford; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptual contributions of the consonant-vowel boundary to sentence intelligibility.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren; C A Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

9.  Critical bandwidth speech: Arrays of subcritical band speech maintain near-ceiling intelligibility at high amplitudes.

Authors:  Richard M Warren; James A Bashford; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Bobby E Gibbs; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.