Literature DB >> 22352519

The role of vowel and consonant fundamental frequency, envelope, and temporal fine structure cues to the intelligibility of words and sentences.

Daniel Fogerty1, Larry E Humes.   

Abstract

The speech signal contains many acoustic properties that may contribute differently to spoken word recognition. Previous studies have demonstrated that the importance of properties present during consonants or vowels is dependent upon the linguistic context (i.e., words versus sentences). The current study investigated three potentially informative acoustic properties that are present during consonants and vowels for monosyllabic words and sentences. Natural variations in fundamental frequency were either flattened or removed. The speech envelope and temporal fine structure were also investigated by limiting the availability of these cues via noisy signal extraction. Thus, this study investigated the contribution of these acoustic properties, present during either consonants or vowels, to overall word and sentence intelligibility. Results demonstrated that all processing conditions displayed better performance for vowel-only sentences. Greater performance with vowel-only sentences remained, despite removing dynamic cues of the fundamental frequency. Word and sentence comparisons suggest that the speech envelope may be at least partially responsible for additional vowel contributions in sentences. Results suggest that speech information transmitted by the envelope is responsible, in part, for greater vowel contributions in sentences, but is not predictive for isolated words.
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22352519      PMCID: PMC3292616          DOI: 10.1121/1.3676696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  48 in total

1.  The effects of a flattened fundamental frequency on intelligibility at the sentence level.

Authors:  J S Laures; G Weismer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  Christopher J Darwin; Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory grouping based on fundamental frequency and formant peak frequency.

Authors:  A S Bregman; C Liao; R Levitan
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1990-09

4.  Are vowels and consonants processed differently? Event-related potential evidence with a delayed letter paradigm.

Authors:  Manuel Carreiras; Margaret Gillon-Dowens; Marta Vergara; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effects of single-band syllabic amplitude compression on temporal speech information in nonsense syllables and in sentences.

Authors:  D J Van Tasell; T D Trine
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-10

Review 6.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Sumiko Takayanagi; Donald D Dirks; Anahita Moshfegh
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Gaëtan Gilbert; Héloïse Carn; Stéphane Garnier; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Effects of the salience of pitch and periodicity information on the intelligibility of four-channel vocoded speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  A Faulkner; S Rosen; C Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  16 in total

1.  Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Vowel acoustics in Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis: comparison of clear, loud, and slow speaking conditions.

Authors:  Kris Tjaden; Jennifer Lam; Greg Wilding
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Predictions of Speech Chimaera Intelligibility Using Auditory Nerve Mean-Rate and Spike-Timing Neural Cues.

Authors:  Michael R Wirtzfeld; Rasha A Ibrahim; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-26

4.  Intelligibility and Clarity of Reverberant Speech: Effects of Wide Dynamic Range Compression Release Time and Working Memory.

Authors:  Paul N Reinhart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Importance of envelope modulations during consonants and vowels in segmentally interrupted sentences.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Electrophysiologic Assessment of Auditory Training Benefits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Kimberly Jenkins
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

7.  Acoustic predictors of intelligibility for segmentally interrupted speech: temporal envelope, voicing, and duration.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Diane Kewley-Port; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effect of initial-consonant intensity on the speed of lexical decisions.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Allen A Montgomery; Kimberlee A Crass
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Assessment of low-frequency hearing with narrow-band chirp-evoked 40-Hz sinusoidal auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Uzma S Wilson; Wafaa A Kaf; Ali A Danesh; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.