Literature DB >> 20968381

Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.

Xin Wang1, Larry E Humes.   

Abstract

This study examined the effect of interruption parameters (e.g., interruption rate, on-duration and proportion), linguistic factors, and other general factors, on the recognition of interrupted consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) words in quiet. Sixty-two young adults with normal-hearing were randomly assigned to one of three test groups, "male65," "female65" and "male85," that differed in talker (male/female) and presentation level (65/85 dB SPL), with about 20 subjects per group. A total of 13 stimulus conditions, representing different interruption patterns within the words (i.e., various combinations of three interruption parameters), in combination with two values (easy and hard) of lexical difficulty were examined (i.e., 13×2=26 test conditions) within each group. Results showed that, overall, the proportion of speech and lexical difficulty had major effects on the integration and recognition of interrupted CVC words, while the other variables had small effects. Interactions between interruption parameters and linguistic factors were observed: to reach the same degree of word-recognition performance, less acoustic information was required for lexically easy words than hard words. Implications of the findings of the current study for models of the temporal integration of speech are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20968381      PMCID: PMC2981122          DOI: 10.1121/1.3483733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.

Authors:  G A Studebaker; R L Sherbecoe; D M McDaniel; C A Gwaltney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Word onset gating and linguistic context in spoken word recognition by young and elderly adults.

Authors:  A Wingfield; J S Aberdeen; E A Stine
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1991-05

3.  Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations.

Authors:  J A Bashford; K R Riener; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

4.  Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition.

Authors:  D J Van Tasell; S D Soli; V M Kirby; G P Widin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of forward and backward masking on speech intelligibility.

Authors:  D D Dirks; D Bower
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.

Authors:  R Drullman; J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise.

Authors:  G L Powers; J C Wilcox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

10.  Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus; Erin Hayes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  22 in total

1.  Perception of interrupted speech: effects of dual-rate gating on the intelligibility of words and sentences.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perception of interrupted speech: cross-rate variation in the intelligibility of gated and concatenated sentences.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Bobby E Gibbs; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Explaining intelligibility in speech-modulated maskers using acoustic glimpse analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Gibbs; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Xin Wang; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-08

8.  Effects of linguistic experience on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral masker modulation.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The importance of processing resolution in "ideal time-frequency segregation" of masked speech and the implications for predicting speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Virginia Best; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Does Time Compression Decrease Intelligibility for Female Talkers More Than for Male Talkers?

Authors:  Eric M Johnson; Shae D Morgan; Sarah Hargus Ferguson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.