Literature DB >> 32259460

Does Time Compression Decrease Intelligibility for Female Talkers More Than for Male Talkers?

Eric M Johnson1,2, Shae D Morgan1,3, Sarah Hargus Ferguson1.   

Abstract

Purpose This preliminary investigation compared effects of time compression on intelligibility for male versus female talkers. We hypothesized that time compression would have a greater effect for female talkers. Method Sentence materials from four talkers (two males) were time compressed, and original-speed and time-compressed speech materials were presented in a background of 12-talker babble to young adult listeners with normal hearing. Each talker/processing condition was heard by eight listeners (total N = 64). Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to determine the effects of and interaction between processing condition and talker sex on keyword intelligibility. Additional post hoc analyses examined whether processing condition effects were related to talker vowel space and word frequency. Results For original-speed sentences, female and male talkers were essentially equally intelligible. Time compression reduced intelligibility for all talkers, but the effect was significantly greater for the female talkers. Supplementary analyses revealed that the effect of time compression depended on both talker vowel space and word frequency: The detrimental effect decreased significantly as word frequency and vowel space increased. Word frequency effects were also greater overall for talkers with larger vowel spaces. Conclusions While the small talker sample limits conclusions about the effects of talker sex, the secondary analyses suggest that intelligibility of talkers with larger vowel spaces is less susceptible to the negative effect of time compression, especially for high-frequency words.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32259460      PMCID: PMC7242980          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  36 in total

1.  Recognition of time-distorted sentences by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Q J Fu; J J Galvin; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of rate-alteration on speech perception in noise in older adults with normal hearing and hearing impairment.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Adams; Susan Gordon-Hickey; Holly Morlas; Robert Moore
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Are there sex effects for speech intelligibility in American English? Examining the influence of talker, listener, and methodology.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Dane B Whittaker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Gina M Torretta; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability.

Authors:  D N Kalikow; K N Stevens; L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Recognition of time-compressed speech does not predict recognition of natural fast-rate speech by older listeners.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Danielle J Zion; Carol Espy-Wilson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech.

Authors:  M A Picheny; N I Durlach; L D Braida
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1986-12

9.  Effect of frequency-altered feedback on stuttering frequency at normal and fast speech rates.

Authors:  S Hargrave; J Kalinowski; A Stuart; J Armson; K Jones
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-12

10.  Speech perception at positive signal-to-noise ratios using adaptive adjustment of time compression.

Authors:  Anne Schlueter; Thomas Brand; Ulrike Lemke; Stefan Nitzschner; Birger Kollmeier; Inga Holube
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.