Literature DB >> 24606272

Effects of linguistic experience on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral masker modulation.

Lauren Calandruccio1, Emily Buss2, Joseph W Hall2.   

Abstract

Masked speech perception can often be improved by modulating the masker temporally and/or spectrally. These effects tend to be larger in normal-hearing listeners than hearing-impaired listeners, and effects of temporal modulation are larger in adults than young children [Hall et al. (2012). Ear Hear. 33, 340-348]. Initial reports indicate non-native adult speakers of the target language also have a reduced ability to benefit from temporal masker modulation [Stuart et al. (2010). J. Am. Acad. Aud. 21, 239-248]. The present study further investigated the effect of masker modulation on English speech recognition in normal-hearing adults who are non-native speakers of English. Sentence recognition was assessed in a steady-state baseline masker condition and in three modulated masker conditions, characterized by spectral, temporal, or spectro-temporal modulation. Thresholds for non-natives were poorer than those of native English speakers in all conditions, particularly in the presence of a modulated masker. The group differences were consistent across maskers when assessed in percent correct, suggesting that a single factor may limit the performance of non-native listeners similarly in all conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24606272      PMCID: PMC4042472          DOI: 10.1121/1.4864785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  45 in total

1.  Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; John H Grose; Emily Buss; Madhu B Dev
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Frédéric Berthommier; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise.

Authors:  L H Mayo; M Florentine; S Buus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.

Authors:  Claus Christiansen; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Ann R Bradlow; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.

Authors:  Su-Hyun Jin; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08

10.  The importance for speech intelligibility of random fluctuations in "steady" background noise.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Christian Füllgrabe; Robert C Mackinnon; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee; Torben Pastore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modulation masking release using the Brazilian-Portuguese HINT: psychometric functions and the effect of speech time compression.

Authors:  John H Grose; Silvana Griz; Fernando A Pacífico; Karina P Advíncula; Denise C Menezes
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Spectral integration of English speech for non-native English speakers.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory-neurophysiological responses to speech during early childhood: Effects of background noise.

Authors:  Travis White-Schwoch; Evan C Davies; Elaine C Thompson; Kali Woodruff Carr; Trent Nicol; Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Torben Pastore; Briana Rodriguez; William A Yost; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  The Listener Effect in Multitalker Speech Segregation and Talker Identification.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.

Authors:  Lisa Kilman; Adriana Zekveld; Mathias Hällgren; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.