Literature DB >> 10212424

Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.

G A Studebaker1, R L Sherbecoe, D M McDaniel, C A Gwaltney.   

Abstract

The effects of intensity on monosyllabic word recognition were studied in adults with normal hearing and mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. The stimuli were bandlimited NU#6 word lists presented in quiet and talker-spectrum-matched noise. Speech levels ranged from 64 to 99 dB SPL and S/N ratios from 28 to -4 dB. In quiet, the performance of normal-hearing subjects remained essentially constant in noise, at a fixed S/N ratio, it decreased as a linear function of speech level. Hearing-impaired subjects performed like normal-hearing subjects tested in noise when the data were corrected for the effects of audibility loss. From these and other results, it was concluded that: (1) speech intelligibility in noise decreases when speech levels exceed 69 dB SPL and the S/N ratio remains constant; (2) the effects of speech and noise level are synergistic; (3) the deterioration in intelligibility can be modeled as a relative increase in the effective masking level; (4) normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects are affected similarly by increased signal level when differences in speech audibility are considered; (5) the negative effects of increasing speech and noise levels on speech recognition are similar for all adult subjects, at least up to 80 years; and (6) the effective dynamic range of speech may be larger than the commonly assumed value of 30 dB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10212424     DOI: 10.1121/1.426848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  57 in total

1.  The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Rithika Saripella; Philipos C Loizou; Linda Thibodeau; Jennifer A Alford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Clinical evaluation of the xDP output compression strategy for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli; Nicolas Guevara; Jean-Pierre Bebear; Marine Ardoint; Sonia Saaï; Michel Hoen; Dan Gnansia; Philippe Romanet; Jean-Pierre Lavieille
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Speech enhancement for listeners with hearing loss based on a model for vowel coding in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Akshay Rao; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Enhancing intelligibility of narrowband speech with out-of-band noise: evidence for lateral suppression at high-normal intensity.

Authors:  James A Bashford; Richard M Warren; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Correction of the peripheral spatiotemporal response pattern: a potential new signal-processing strategy.

Authors:  Lu-Feng Shi; Laurel H Carney; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 7.  Reorganization of the adult auditory system: perceptual and physiological evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids.

Authors:  Kevin J Munro
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-09

8.  Maintaining intelligibility at high speech intensities: evidence of lateral inhibition in the lower auditory pathway.

Authors:  James A Bashford; Richard M Warren; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Predicting perception in noise using cortical auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Garnett P McMillan; Tina M Penman; Sun Mi Gille
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-13

10.  The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.