Literature DB >> 30075693

Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation.

William J Bologna1, Kenneth I Vaden1, Jayne B Ahlstrom1, Judy R Dubno1.   

Abstract

In realistic listening environments, speech perception requires grouping together audible fragments of speech, filling in missing information, and segregating the glimpsed target from the background. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which age-related difficulties with these tasks can be explained by declines in glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and/or speech segregation. Younger and older adults with normal hearing listened to sentences interrupted with silence or envelope-modulated noise, presented either in quiet or with a competing talker. Older adults were poorer than younger adults at recognizing keywords based on short glimpses but benefited more when envelope-modulated noise filled silent intervals. Recognition declined with a competing talker but this effect did not interact with age. Results of cognitive tasks indicated that faster processing speed and better visual-linguistic closure were predictive of better speech understanding. Taken together, these results suggest that age-related declines in speech recognition may be partially explained by difficulty grouping short glimpses of speech into a coherent message.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30075693      PMCID: PMC6047943          DOI: 10.1121/1.5044397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  72 in total

1.  Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words.

Authors:  M S Vitevitch; P A Luce; D B Pisoni; E T Auer
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners.

Authors:  Erwin L J George; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; S Theo Goverts; Joost M Festen; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren; C A Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

6.  Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise.

Authors:  G L Powers; J C Wilcox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.

Authors:  Su-Hyun Jin; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Lipid and C-reactive protein levels as risk factors for hearing loss in older adults.

Authors:  Annie N Simpson; Lois J Matthews; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Phonemic restoration by hearing-impaired listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent; Cheryl L Eiler; Brent Edwards
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  11 in total

1.  Age effects on the contributions of envelope and periodicity cues to recognition of interrupted speech in quiet and with a competing talker.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of fundamental frequency contour similarity on multi-talker listening in older and younger adults.

Authors:  Peter A Wasiuk; Mathieu Lavandier; Emily Buss; Jacob Oleson; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The importance of a broad bandwidth for understanding "glimpsed" speech.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Lucas Baltzell; Jan Rennies; Mathieu Lavandier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Older adult recognition error patterns when listening to interrupted speech and speech in steady-state noise.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Impacts of signal processing factors on perceptual restoration in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Sarah Weinstein; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

Review 7.  [Audiometric test battery for presbycusis].

Authors:  T Steffens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Phonological and semantic similarity of misperceived words in babble: Effects of sentence context, age, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Blythe Vickery; Daniel Fogerty; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Evidence for cortical adjustments to perceptual decision criteria during word recognition in noise.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 7.400

10.  Contributions of Voice Expectations to Talker Selection in Younger and Older Adults With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.