Literature DB >> 833372

Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise.

G L Powers, J C Wilcox.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 833372     DOI: 10.1121/1.381255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


× No keyword cloud information.
  28 in total

1.  Phonemic restoration effect reversed in a reverberant room.

Authors:  Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perception of interrupted speech: effects of dual-rate gating on the intelligibility of words and sentences.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations.

Authors:  J A Bashford; K R Riener; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

5.  Listening to speech in the presence of other sounds.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Masking release for words in amplitude-modulated noise as a function of modulation rate and task.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lisa N Whittle; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Recognition of interrupted sentences under conditions of spectral degradation.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Fabiola Peredo; Desirae Nelson; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perception of interrupted speech: cross-rate variation in the intelligibility of gated and concatenated sentences.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren; C A Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

10.  Effects of age and hearing loss on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.