Literature DB >> 29857765

Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.

Rachel E Miller1, Bobby E Gibbs1, Daniel Fogerty1.   

Abstract

Everyday environments frequently present speech in modulated noise backgrounds, such as from a competing talker. Under such conditions, temporal glimpses of speech may be preserved at favorable signal-to-noise ratios during the amplitude dips of the masker. Speech recognition is determined, in part, by these speech glimpses. However, properties of the noise when it dominates the speech may also be important. This study interrupted speech to provide either high-intensity or low-intensity speech glimpses derived from measurements of speech-on-speech masking. These interrupted intervals were deleted and subsequently filled by steady-state noise or one of four different types of noise amplitude modulated by the same or different sentence. Noise was presented at two different levels. Interruption by silence was also examined. Speech recognition was best with high-intensity glimpses and improved when the noise was modulated by missing high-intensity segments. Additional noise conditions detailed significant interactions between the noise level and glimpsed speech level. Overall, high-intensity speech segments, and the amplitude modulation (AM) of the segments, are crucial for speech recognition. Speech recognition is further influenced by the properties of the competing noise (i.e., level and AM) which interact with the glimpsed speech level. Acoustic properties of both speech-dominated and noise-dominated intervals of speech-noise mixtures determine speech recognition.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29857765      PMCID: PMC5966307          DOI: 10.1121/1.5038273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  48 in total

1.  Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations.

Authors:  J A Bashford; K R Riener; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

3.  Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren; C A Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

4.  Assessing the perceptual contributions of level-dependent segments to sentence intelligibility.

Authors:  Tian Guan; Guang-Xing Chu; Yu Tsao; Fei Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise.

Authors:  G L Powers; J C Wilcox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Acoustic predictors of intelligibility for segmentally interrupted speech: temporal envelope, voicing, and duration.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; William J Bologna; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Using Zebra-speech to study sequential and simultaneous speech segregation in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Audiometric test battery for presbycusis].

Authors:  T Steffens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Access to semantic cues does not lead to perceptual restoration of interrupted speech in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Sarah Weinstein; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech Intelligibility Prediction using Spectro-Temporal Modulation Analysis.

Authors:  Amin Edraki; Wai-Yip Chan; Jesper Jensen; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2020-11-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.