Literature DB >> 22872414

Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues.

Judy R Dubno1, Jayne B Ahlstrom, Xin Wang, Amy R Horwitz.   

Abstract

Level-dependent changes in temporal envelope fluctuations in speech and related changes in speech recognition may reveal effects of basilar-membrane nonlinearities. As a result of compression in the basilar-membrane response, the "effective" magnitude of envelope fluctuations may be reduced as speech level increases from lower level (more linear) to mid-level (more compressive) regions. With further increases to a more linear region, speech envelope fluctuations may become more pronounced. To assess these effects, recognition of consonants and key words in sentences was measured as a function of speech level for younger adults with normal hearing. Consonant-vowel syllables and sentences were spectrally degraded using "noise vocoder" processing to maximize perceptual effects of changes to the speech envelope. Broadband noise at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio maintained constant audibility as speech level increased. Results revealed significant increases in scores and envelope-dependent feature transmission from 45 to 60 dB SPL and decreasing scores and feature transmission from 60 to 85 dB SPL. This quadratic pattern, with speech recognition maximized at mid levels and poorer at lower and higher levels, is consistent with a role of cochlear nonlinearities in perception of speech envelope cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22872414      PMCID: PMC3505593          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-012-0343-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  58 in total

1.  Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Use of performance-intensity functions for diagnosis.

Authors:  D D Dirks; C Kamm; D Bower; A Betsworth
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1977-08

4.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability.

Authors:  D N Kalikow; K N Stevens; L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features.

Authors:  M D Wang; R C Bilger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Encoding of steady-state vowels in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate.

Authors:  M B Sachs; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Representation of steady-state vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  E D Young; M B Sachs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Evaluating adaptation and olivocochlear efferent feedback as potential explanations of psychophysical overshoot.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Michael G Heinz; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-26

9.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.

Authors:  P A Dorn; D Konrad-Martin; S T Neely; D H Keefe; E Cyr; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Cochlear compression: perceptual measures and implications for normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  3 in total

1.  Adaptation to Noise in Human Speech Recognition Unrelated to the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.

Authors:  Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez; Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Adaptation to Noise in Human Speech Recognition Depends on Noise-Level Statistics and Fast Dynamic-Range Compression.

Authors:  Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez; Dora Del Pilar Sturla-Carreto; Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Compression and amplification algorithms in hearing aids impair the selectivity of neural responses to speech.

Authors:  Alex G Armstrong; Chi Chung Lam; Shievanie Sabesan; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 29.234

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.