Literature DB >> 27914381

Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Daniel Fogerty1, Jiaqian Xu1, Bobby E Gibbs1.   

Abstract

Compared to notionally steady-state noise, modulated maskers provide a perceptual benefit for speech recognition, in part due to preserved speech information during the amplitude dips of the masker. However, overlap in the modulation spectrum between the target speech and the competing modulated masker may potentially result in modulation masking, and thereby offset the release from energetic masking. The current study investigated masking release provided by single-talker modulated noise. The overlap in the modulation spectra of the target speech and the modulated noise masker was varied through time compression or expansion of the competing masker. Younger normal hearing adults listened to sentences that were unprocessed or noise vocoded to primarily limit speech recognition to the preserved temporal envelope cues. For unprocessed speech, results demonstrated improved performance with masker modulation spectrum shifted up or down compared to the target modulation spectrum, except for the most extreme time expansion. For vocoded speech, significant masking release was observed with the slowest masker rate. Perceptual results combined with acoustic analyses of the preserved glimpses of the target speech suggest contributions of modulation masking and cognitive-linguistic processing as factors contributing to performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27914381      PMCID: PMC5848862          DOI: 10.1121/1.4962494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  65 in total

1.  Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution.

Authors:  Su-Hyun Jin; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Frédéric Berthommier; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech.

Authors:  Ulrik Kjems; Jesper B Boldt; Michael S Pedersen; Thomas Lunner; Deliang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Across-critical-band processing of amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  W A Yost; S Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.

Authors:  R Drullman; J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Exploring the role of the modulation spectrum in phoneme recognition.

Authors:  Frederick Gallun; Pamela Souza
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The importance for speech intelligibility of random fluctuations in "steady" background noise.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Christian Füllgrabe; Robert C Mackinnon; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  15 in total

1.  Efficiency in glimpsing vowel sequences in fluctuating makers: Effects of temporal fine structure and temporal regularity.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Dylan V Pearson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of speech-rhythm disruption on selective listening with a single background talker.

Authors:  J Devin McAuley; Yi Shen; Toni Smith; Gary R Kidd
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Recognition of synthesized vowel sequences in steady-state and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Dylan V Pearson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Glimpsing speech in temporally and spectro-temporally modulated noise.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Brittney L Carter; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Bobby E Gibbs; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Explaining intelligibility in speech-modulated maskers using acoustic glimpse analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Gibbs; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Masking of short tones in noise: Evidence for envelope-based, rather than energy-based detection.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jessica Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Infants' use of isolated and combined temporal cues in speech sound segregation.

Authors:  Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech Intelligibility Prediction using Spectro-Temporal Modulation Analysis.

Authors:  Amin Edraki; Wai-Yip Chan; Jesper Jensen; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2020-11-24

10.  Spectro-temporal glimpsing of speech in noise: Regularity and coherence of masking patterns reduces uncertainty and increases intelligibility.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Victoria A Sevich; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.