Literature DB >> 23421473

Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.

Michael Dambacher1, Timothy J Slattery, Jinmian Yang, Reinhold Kliegl, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

It is well established that fixation durations during reading vary with processing difficulty, but there are different views on how oculomotor control, visual perception, shifts of attention, and lexical (and higher cognitive) processing are coordinated. Evidence for a one-to-one translation of input delay into saccadic latency would provide a much needed constraint for current theoretical proposals. Here, we tested predictions of such a direct-control perspective using the stimulus-onset delay (SOD) paradigm. Words in sentences were initially masked and, on fixation, were individually unmasked with a delay (0-, 33-, 66-, 99-ms SODs). In Experiment 1, SODs were constant for all words in a sentence; in Experiment 2, SODs were manipulated on target words, while nontargets were unmasked without delay. In accordance with predictions of direct control, nonzero SODs entailed equivalent increases in fixation durations in both experiments. Yet, a population of short fixations pointed to rapid saccades as a consequence of low-level information at nonoptimal viewing positions rather than of lexical processing. Implications of these results for theoretical accounts of oculomotor control are discussed. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23421473      PMCID: PMC3925305          DOI: 10.1037/a0031647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  42 in total

1.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Ralf Engbert; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Sarah J White; Denis Drieghe; Elizabeth C Hollway; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Synchronizing timelines: relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading.

Authors:  Michael Dambacher; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

6.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A W Inhoff; R E Morrison; M L Slowiaczek; J H Bertera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Reading without a fovea.

Authors:  K Rayner; J H Bertera
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

9.  Eye movements when reading disappearing text: the importance of the word to the right of fixation.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Simon P Liversedge; Sarah J White
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model.

Authors:  Daniel J Schad; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23
View more
  5 in total

1.  Word frequency in fast priming: Evidence for immediate cognitive control of eye-movements during reading.

Authors:  Daniel J Schad; Sarah Risse; Timothy Slattery; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-03-01

2.  Eye movements during text reading align with the rate of speech production.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Klara Gregorova; Julius Golch; Stefan Hawelka; Jona Sassenhagen; Alessandro Tavano; David Poeppel; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-12-06

3.  Effects of Reading Proficiency and of Base and Whole-Word Frequency on Reading Noun- and Verb-Derived Words: An Eye-Tracking Study in Italian Primary School Children.

Authors:  Daniela Traficante; Marco Marelli; Claudio Luzzatti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-28

4.  Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations.

Authors:  Timothy J Slattery; Adam J Parker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

5.  The Influence of Content Meaningfulness on Eye Movements across Tasks: Evidence from Scene Viewing and Reading.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; John M Henderson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.