Literature DB >> 15301620

The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.

Keith Rayner1, Jane Ashby, Alexander Pollatsek, Erik D Reichle.   

Abstract

Readers read sentences containing target words varying in frequency and predictability. The observed pattern of data for fixation durations only mildly departed from additivity, with predictability effects that were slightly larger for low-frequency than for high-frequency words. The pattern of data for skipping was different as predictability affected only the probability of skipping for high-frequency target words. Simulations of these data using the E-Z Reader model indicated that a single-process model was unlikely to provide a good fit for both measures. A version of the model that assumes that (a) word-encoding time is additively affected by frequency and predictability and (b) difficulty with postlexical processing of the target word causes a double take accounted for the data while indicating that the relationship between the duration of hypothesized word-encoding stages and observed fixation durations is not likely to be transparent.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15301620     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  56 in total

1.  Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data.

Authors:  Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 0.957

2.  Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Brianna M Eiter; Ralph Radach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Charles Clifton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Temporal overlap in the linguistic processing of successive words in reading: reply to Pollatsek, Reichle, and Rayner (2006a).

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Ralph Radach; Brianna Eiter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Sarah J White; Denis Drieghe; Elizabeth C Hollway; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Word frequency and predictability effects in reading French: an evaluation of the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  Sébastien Miellet; Laurent Sparrow; Sara C Sereno
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

7.  The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

10.  Using E-Z Reader to examine the consequences of fixation-location measurement error.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.