Literature DB >> 28447810

Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.

Daniel Schmidtke1, Kazunaga Matsuki1, Victor Kuperman1.   

Abstract

The current study addresses a discrepancy in the psycholinguistic literature about the chronology of information processing during the visual recognition of morphologically complex words. Form-then-meaning accounts of complex word recognition claim that morphemes are processed as units of form prior to any influence of their meanings, whereas form-and-meaning models posit that recognition of complex word forms involves the simultaneous access of morphological and semantic information. The study reported here addresses this theoretical discrepancy by applying a nonparametric distributional technique of survival analysis (Reingold & Sheridan, 2014) to 2 behavioral measures of complex word processing. Across 7 experiments reported here, this technique is employed to estimate the point in time at which orthographic, morphological, and semantic variables exert their earliest discernible influence on lexical decision RTs and eye movement fixation durations. Contrary to form-then-meaning predictions, Experiments 1-4 reveal that surface frequency is the earliest lexical variable to exert a demonstrable influence on lexical decision RTs for English and Dutch derived words (e.g., badness; bad + ness), English pseudoderived words (e.g., wander; wand + er) and morphologically simple control words (e.g., ballad; ball + ad). Furthermore, for derived word processing across lexical decision and eye-tracking paradigms (Experiments 1-2; 5-7), semantic effects emerge early in the time-course of word recognition, and their effects either precede or emerge simultaneously with morphological effects. These results are not consistent with the premises of the form-then-meaning view of complex word recognition, but are convergent with a form-and-meaning account of complex word recognition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28447810      PMCID: PMC5659973          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  73 in total

1.  Early influences of word length and frequency: a group study using MEG.

Authors:  Ramin Assadollahi; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect.

Authors:  Marcus Taft
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2004-05

3.  SUBTLEX-NL: a new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles.

Authors:  Emmanuel Keuleers; Marc Brysbaert; Boris New
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-08

4.  Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity.

Authors:  Sarah J White
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Lexical access in early stages of visual word processing: a single-trial correlational MEG study of heteronym recognition.

Authors:  Olla Solomyak; Alec Marantz
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Emotion and memory: a recognition advantage for positive and negative words independent of arousal.

Authors:  James S Adelman; Zachary Estes
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-09-14

7.  The fruitless effort of growing a fruitless tree: Early morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic effects in sentence reading.

Authors:  Simona Amenta; Marco Marelli; Davide Crepaldi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 8.  Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Asif A Ghazanfar; Alex Gomez-Marin; Malcolm A MacIver; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data.

Authors:  O Hauk; M H Davis; M Ford; F Pulvermüller; W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Accentuate the positive: semantic access in english compounds.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-24
View more
  5 in total

1.  Are divergence point analyses suitable for response time data?

Authors:  Pablo Gómez; Javier Breithaupt; Manuel Perea; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-02

2.  Malay Lexicon Project 2: Morphology in Malay word recognition.

Authors:  Mirrah Maziyah Mohamed; Melvin J Yap; Qian Wen Chee; Debra Jared
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Opacity, Transparency, and Morphological Priming: A Study of Prefixed Verbs in Dutch.

Authors:  Ava Creemers; Amy Goodwin Davies; Robert J Wilder; Meredith Tamminga; David Embick
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Masked Morphological Priming and Sensitivity to the Statistical Structure of Form-to-Meaning Mapping in L2.

Authors:  Eva Viviani; Davide Crepaldi
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-05-09

5.  The processing of pseudoword form and meaning in production and comprehension: A computational modeling approach using linear discriminative learning.

Authors:  Yu-Ying Chuang; Marie Lenka Vollmer; Elnaz Shafaei-Bajestan; Susanne Gahl; Peter Hendrix; R Harald Baayen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.