Literature DB >> 25939443

An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading.

Heather Sheridan1, Erik D Reichle1.   

Abstract

Reingold, Reichle, Glaholt, and Sheridan (2012) reported a gaze-contingent eye-movement experiment in which survival-curve analyses were used to examine the effects of word frequency, the availability of parafoveal preview, and initial fixation location on the time course of lexical processing. The key results of these analyses suggest that lexical processing begins very rapidly (after approximately 120 ms) and is supported by substantial parafoveal processing (more than 100 ms). Because it is not immediately obvious that these results are congruent with the theoretical assumption that words are processed and identified in a strictly serial manner, we attempted to simulate the experiment using the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control (Reichle, 2011). These simulations were largely consistent with the empirical results, suggesting that parafoveal processing does play an important functional role by allowing lexical processing to occur rapidly enough to mediate direct control over when the eyes move during reading.
Copyright © 2015 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Computational modeling; Distributional analyses; E-Z Reader; Eye movements; Lexical processing; Reading; Time course

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25939443      PMCID: PMC5122144          DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  51 in total

1.  Using E-Z Reader to simulate eye movements in nonreading tasks: a unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Alexander Pollatsek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination.

Authors:  Sarah J White; Keith Rayner; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

5.  Development of the letter identity span in reading: evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm.

Authors:  Tuomo Häikiö; Raymond Bertram; Jukka Hyönä; Pekka Niemi
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2008-06-05

6.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; S Bolozky; A D Well; K Rayner
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Reading without a fovea.

Authors:  K Rayner; J H Bertera
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

10.  The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model.

Authors:  Daniel J Schad; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23
View more
  3 in total

1.  Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Kayleigh L Warrington; Victoria A McGowan; Kevin B Paterson; Sarah J White
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.051

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.