Literature DB >> 21327339

The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations.

Adrian Staub1.   

Abstract

A word's predictability in context has a well-established effect on fixation durations in reading. To investigate how this effect is manifested in distributional terms, an experiment was carried out in which subjects read each of 50 target words twice, once in a high-predictability context and once in a low-predictability context. The ex-Gaussian distribution was fit to each subject's first-fixation durations and single-fixation durations. For both measures, the μ parameter increased when a word was unpredictable, while the τ parameter was not significantly affected, indicating that a predictability manipulation shifts the distribution of fixation durations but does not affect the degree of skew. Vincentile plots showed that the mean ex-Gaussian parameters described the typical distribution shapes extremely well. These results suggest that the predictability and frequency effects are functionally distinct, since a frequency manipulation has been shown to influence both μ and τ. The results may also be seen as consistent with the finding from single-word recognition paradigms that semantic priming affects only μ.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21327339     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-010-0046-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  27 in total

1.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.

Authors:  Alan Kennedy; Joël Pynte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability.

Authors:  Jane Ashby; Keith Rayner; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-08

4.  Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; David A Balota
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 6.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400.

Authors:  Ellen F Lau; Colin Phillips; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Boris New
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

8.  The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: evidence from eye fixations and naming times.

Authors:  J Altarriba; J F Kroll; A Sholl; K Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

9.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

10.  Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  16 in total

1.  The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

2.  The time course of age-of-acquisition effects on eye movements during reading: Evidence from survival analyses.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Heather Sheridan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01

3.  Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Ashley Benatar
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

4.  Pace Yourself: Intraindividual Variability in Context Use Revealed by Self-paced Event-related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The onset and time course of semantic priming during rapid recognition of visual words.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Word frequency in fast priming: Evidence for immediate cognitive control of eye-movements during reading.

Authors:  Daniel J Schad; Sarah Risse; Timothy Slattery; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-03-01

7.  Survival analyses reveal how early phonological processing affects eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Learning rational temporal eye movement strategies.

Authors:  David Hoppe; Constantin A Rothkopf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  ICAT: a computational model for the adaptive control of fixation durations.

Authors:  Hans A Trukenbrod; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

10.  Eye movements during text reading align with the rate of speech production.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Klara Gregorova; Julius Golch; Stefan Hawelka; Jona Sassenhagen; Alessandro Tavano; David Poeppel; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.