Literature DB >> 12120806

Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions.

Andrew Heathcote1, Scott Brown, D J K Mewhort.   

Abstract

We introduce and evaluate via a Monte Carlo study a robust new estimation technique that fits distribution functions to grouped response time (RT) data, where the grouping is determined by sample quantiles. The new estimator, quantile maximum likelihood (QML), is more efficient and less biased than the best alternative estimation technique when fitting the commonly used ex-Gaussian distribution. Limitations of the Monte Carlo results are discussed and guidance provided for the practical application of the new technique. Because QML estimation can be computationally costly, we make fast open source code for fitting available that can be easily modified to use QML in the estimation of any distribution function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12120806     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment?

Authors:  S Andrews; A Heathcote
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  How to fit a response time distribution.

Authors:  T Van Zandt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

3.  A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching.

Authors:  T Van Zandt; H Colonius; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

4.  Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency.

Authors:  D A Balota; D H Spieler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-03

5.  Response time distributions and the Stroop Task: a test of the Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model.

Authors:  D J Mewhort; J G Braun; A Heathcote
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type.

Authors:  D H Spieler; D A Balota; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics.

Authors:  R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Mean response times, variability, and skew in the responding of ADHD children: a response time distributional approach.

Authors:  C Leth-Steensen; Z K Elbaz; V I Douglas
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2000-05

9.  Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis.

Authors:  R Ulrich; J Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1994-03

10.  An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall.

Authors:  D Rohrer; J T Wixted
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-09
View more
  57 in total

1.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

2.  An evaluation of the Vincentizing method of forming group-level response time distributions.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Paul L Speckman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

3.  A comment on Heathcote, Brown, and Mewhort's QMLE method for response time distributions.

Authors:  Paul L Speckman; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

4.  Effects of healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer's type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks.

Authors:  Chi-Shing Tse; David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Janet M Duchek; David P McCabe
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.

Authors:  Rani Moran; Michael Zehetleitner; Heinrich René Liesefeld; Hermann J Müller; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

6.  A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Jun Lu; Paul Speckman; Dongchu Sun; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

7.  Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Sarah J White; Denis Drieghe; Elizabeth C Hollway; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Aging and intraindividual variability in performance: analyses of response time distributions.

Authors:  Joel Myerson; Shannon Robertson; Sandra Hale
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Fitting the Ratcliff diffusion model to experimental data.

Authors:  Joachm Vandekerckhove; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

10.  Relationship between Stroop performance and resting state functional connectivity in cognitively normal older adults.

Authors:  Janet M Duchek; David A Balota; Jewell B Thomas; Abraham Z Snyder; Patrick Rich; Tammie L Benzinger; Anne M Fagan; David M Holtzman; John C Morris; Beau M Ances
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.