Literature DB >> 23637011

Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading.

Adrian Staub1, Ashley Benatar.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the relationship between the location and skew of an individual reader's fixation duration distribution. The ex-Gaussian distribution was fit to eye fixation data from 153 subjects in five experiments, four previously presented and one new. The τ parameter was entirely uncorrelated with the μ and σ parameters; by contrast, there was a modest positive correlation between these parameters for lexical decision and speeded pronunciation response times. The conclusion that, for fixation durations, the degree of skew is uncorrelated with the location of the distribution's central tendency was also confirmed nonparametrically, by examining vincentile plots for subgroups of subjects. Finally, the stability of distributional parameters for a given subject was demonstrated to be relatively high. Taken together with previous findings of selective influence on the μ parameter of the fixation duration distribution, the present results suggest that in reading, the location and the skew of the fixation duration distribution may reflect functionally distinct processes. The authors speculate that the skew parameter may specifically reflect the frequency of processing disruption.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23637011     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0444-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  22 in total

1.  INFERRED COMPONENTS OF REACTION TIMES AS FUNCTIONS OF FOREPERIOD DURATION.

Authors:  R H HOHLE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-04

2.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  LATER predicts saccade latency distributions in reading.

Authors:  R H S Carpenter; Scott A McDonald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; David A Balota
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Sarah J White; Denis Drieghe; Elizabeth C Hollway; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence.

Authors:  Florian Schmiedek; Klaus Oberauer; Oliver Wilhelm; Heinz-Martin Süss; Werner W Wittmann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

Review 7.  Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: a diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Dora Matzke; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

8.  The distribution of fixation durations during reading: effects of stimulus quality.

Authors:  Sarah J White; Adrian Staub
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  9 in total

1.  fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Cory Shain; Idan Asher Blank; Marten van Schijndel; William Schuler; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  It takes time to prime: semantic priming in the ocular lexical decision task.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Pace Yourself: Intraindividual Variability in Context Use Revealed by Self-paced Event-related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The onset and time course of semantic priming during rapid recognition of visual words.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Predicting eye-movement characteristics across multiple tasks from working memory and executive control.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Emily S Darowski; Shawn D Gale
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

6.  Effects of word predictability on eye movements during Arabic reading.

Authors:  Maryam A AlJassmi; Kayleigh L Warrington; Victoria A McGowan; Sarah J White; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Estimating the divergence point: a novel distributional analysis procedure for determining the onset of the influence of experimental variables.

Authors:  Eyal M Reingold; Heather Sheridan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-08

8.  The Influence of Content Meaningfulness on Eye Movements across Tasks: Evidence from Scene Viewing and Reading.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; John M Henderson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-01

Review 9.  Effects of Normative Aging on Eye Movements during Reading.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Victoria A McGowan; Kayleigh L Warrington; Lin Li; Sha Li; Fang Xie; Min Chang; Sainan Zhao; Ascensión Pagán; Sarah J White; Jingxin Wang
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.